Search found 5168 matches
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:03 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Record count in Data Stage Seq file
- Replies: 26
- Views: 16158
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:54 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: vertical pivot
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1201
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:37 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Record count in Data Stage Seq file
- Replies: 26
- Views: 16158
What version are using? If it is 7.5.1A, batch job is for the same reason. You can find the New bath job from Director menu. The parameters usein the the job (Px job/batch job) can be used inside the code as well. So all those parameter given in the job can be used to call the different jobs. Or the...
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: inserting timestamp into database
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2337
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Datastage error Scratch space full
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13365
Check with the input file size. Try to give atlest twice as large as that, if you have only one sort stage(that is where the current abort is in) in the job. Bear in mind that, the stages like, lookup, sort, remove duplicate, aggregator will use the scratch sapce. So more you of these staeg utilizat...
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:18 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Record count in Data Stage Seq file
- Replies: 26
- Views: 16158
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:14 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SIGSEGV error is coming while running a DS job
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1264
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Complex Flat File Stage server vs parallel
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1532
You are right. CFF in PX cannot change its metadata dynamically based on data, as what redefines is for. So either you need to seperatly process the data for different conditions othere than expected from soruce, before reading into CFF or use other stages to filter it out. Read it as varchar (if po...
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Record count in Data Stage Seq file
- Replies: 26
- Views: 16158
1.There is no built in funciton, but you can biuld in. There is no seperate "DS sequential file" as such. If you point to a unix file, wc is the ideal option. If you are refering a file which are read through DS, you have variables like, @INROWNUM/@OUTROWNUM you can calculate it. 2. Yes there is. Wh...
- Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Login-Error to read Partitioning-Info
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1778
- Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:35 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Warning message when changing lookup stage to a join stage
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1524
Re: Warning message when changing lookup stage to a join sta
First of all why have you removing lookup stage to a join stage for performance improvement because lookup always give better performance to join. dsusr Not in all cases. Untill the lookup data is small enough to handled in lookup memory, lookup approach is better. Once it is beyond certain limit, ...
- Sun Jul 30, 2006 3:10 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Variable-length record
- Replies: 15
- Views: 11546
- Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Record count not matching up
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1219
- Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:46 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: rejected records
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6142
- Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:44 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: vertical pivot
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1201
If you number of records per group is limited to 3, the above solutin will work out. You can also do this with a transformer and aggregator combination. Search for your title you will get lot of post. If you are not sure about the nubmer of records per group, writing a custom code will be your best ...