Search found 3329 matches
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:37 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: patch 30015v3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 882
I believe a patch will be tested before releasing by IBM. Ask them whether any other client have been provided the same patch and whether they encountered any error like yours. If you can provide more information on the errors you receive (after installing the patch) others can see whether the same ...
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: error 39202 after installation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1264
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:53 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Perfomace Improvement??
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4590
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Perfomace Improvement??
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4590
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:30 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: error 39202 after installation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1264
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:04 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Perfomace Improvement??
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4590
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:54 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Perfomace Improvement??
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4590
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: OCI has fetched truncated data--Peoplesoft DataStage
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11446
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:14 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Pros and Cons of I/O
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2208
This is a very open ended question. Similar issues are discussed several times before. What is your requirement? There are many variables such as number of tables sourced from, transformation logic, space available, volume of data, machine capacity etc etc etc etc So better do on a case-by-case basis.
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:59 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Perfomace Improvement??
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4590
Personally I think the source is not the bottleneck. It must be the sort and agg in DS. As you said you are not doing anything in tx, you may be better-off doing the whole in Oracle SQL itself. Something like Insert into...... as Select ...... Group By ...... This way you avoid the transfer over net...
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Perfomace Improvement??
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4590
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:47 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Problem with permission
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4274
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:42 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Dynamic number
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1779
As long as you do not change the PROCESS_NUMBER column in the table it is max() from, the value will remain same. In other words, commit the max(PROCESS_NUMBER) + 1 back in the table after successful completion of current run. If it is from the same target table where you are loading the rows, then ...
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:47 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Dynamic number
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1779
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DRS Error
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1694