Search found 15603 matches
- Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Datastage Job Design
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3892
Athira, start with a very simple job, just your data source to a transform and output to a dummy sequential file. Get this working. Then add one reference lookup and get that working (again to the dummy output file). Finally add your last reference, and once that is working to your satisfaction fina...
- Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:31 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sort stage is not working
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2157
- Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:13 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Error while running job
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1508
- Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:59 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Empty String identification
- Replies: 4
- Views: 909
- Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:56 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: SME
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4466
Could it be SMEagol you are looking at? If so, it is a common medical condition affecting DataStage developers that, over time, tends to eliminate them from the gene pool. It is caused by lack of daylight and by crooning over DS jobs (sometimes accompanied by chants of "there, my lovely" when compil...
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Must be an Info Technologist
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1165
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:19 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: problem with column with name "TIME_STAMP" or &quo
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1580
What database and stage are you using? To rephrase your question, you have a column called "TIME_STAMP" in a table. You've loaded that table's metadata into DataStage and have used that in a database stage. When you do a "view data" on that table you get the error that the column "TIME_STAMP" doesn'...
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Compiling Transformer
- Replies: 1
- Views: 688
Did you not post this exact same question earlier? Also, I'll chime in before someone else does regarding the use of "urgent". What is urgent for you is not necessarily so for the volunteer members of this forum. You normally need a pricey service contract from your provider to get immediate replies...
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:06 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Empty String identification
- Replies: 4
- Views: 909
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:04 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Broken pipe error - SIGBUS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1968
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: function
- Replies: 1
- Views: 585
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:41 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Broken pipe error - SIGBUS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1968
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:35 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Run a job without waiting to complete
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3060
In that case you should write a "master" sequence which calls the first job/sequence without waiting. I see two ways to do this for you: 1 - use the command to run "dsjob -run -mode normal {job} {project}" 2 - use a job activity to start the job in a sequence. Then look at the job control for the BA...
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Broken pipe error - SIGBUS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1968
Can you narrow down the causes? Does the error happen right away or after a while and processing n-rows? If so, does it always fail on the same row? Which stage do you replace with a lookup stage (and what are you looking up - another table)? Have you tried changing the job to run on just 1 node to ...
- Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:36 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Run a job without waiting to complete
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3060