Search found 15603 matches
- Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:31 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Installation of Enterprise Edition on Windows Server 2003.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 884
- Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Passing partly sorted data into the Aggregator
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1413
- Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:31 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: rows/sec cannot be used to identify bottlenecks within a job
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1060
As you've discovered, the rows/second cannot be used in the way you want. If you add a sequential file stage between important stages in your job you will see that you can use rows/second to identify your slowest stages, since this breaks up the flow into distinct elements. This is not necessarily t...
- Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sample stage : Sample mode = Percent
- Replies: 4
- Views: 881
The seed value is used to ensure that you get the same sampled records each run (assuming you use the same seed). Random number generators are actually "pseudo" random generators that use complex forumulas to generate sequences of numbers. With the same seed you will get the same results each time. ...
- Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:19 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Passing partly sorted data into the Aggregator
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1413
- Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: sample stage output problem
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2628
- Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Probelm to attach the Px job in Job Activity of the Sequence
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1710
- Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Undefined symbol: .DSOpenProjectEx
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4733
- Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Date Validation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1317
- Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Passing partly sorted data into the Aggregator
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1413
- Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:47 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: problem with converting to 64 bit hash file
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1401
Try this to prove the point that Ray and Craig are trying to make. Do an ANALYZE.FILE to get the modulo for the current file. Then do a "CREATE.FILE NewFile DYNAMIC GENERAL MINIMUM.MODULO {mod} 64BIT". This will create an empty file that is presized. If you can create the file, then you can issue a ...
- Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:40 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: removing *s
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2941
- Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:43 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Reporting Discarded records in a flat file
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3184
- Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:13 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Reporting Discarded records in a flat file
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3184
The record is discarded in the read stage, so the transform stage would never see it. I like defining the record as a single large string, then in a transform stage use the delimiter count to decide whether a record is valid, if not then concatenate it with the previous one (using a stage variable);...
- Sat Jun 09, 2007 1:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to improve performance of job(having one insert and one
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1901
Rakesh, although you haven't specified your source or target, when jobs slow down over time it is most often due to the output stage. If you are writing to a database, it might be that there are indices being built in the background or activities like buffering or rollback/before images. Try using a...