Search found 15603 matches
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: concatenate two fields (dont use a transformer)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5294
The row merge does something completely different. The correct stage to use would be the modify stage, I am not sure if the default ":" concatenation operator can be used or if you need to call one of the builtin string functions. There is no reason not to use the Transform stage; the only stage tha...
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:10 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How Oracle Enterprise stage reformats SQL with /*+rowid(p)*/
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1026
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:52 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Reg: Fatal Error in SCD stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 976
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Basic transformer functionality
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1451
I do think that basic transformer does the work. when i try to capture the DBMSCODE out of Basic Transformer its giving 0 as output always But doesn't that mean that the BASIC transform doesn't work? If you intentionally force a database error (i.e. put a NULL value in a non-nullable field) do you ...
- Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:31 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Run out of resources
- Replies: 1
- Views: 669
There are many ways to approach this "throttling" of resources; but none of them are builtin to the product One simple (but not necessarily 100% effective approach) is to add a call to a user-written before job routine in every PX job. This could easily be added to all by doing an export of the proj...
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Hi all
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1450
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Oracle UPSERT commit intervals
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1744
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Oracle UPSERT commit intervals
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1744
Oracle UPSERT commit intervals
I have a job that set the following two values where I am doing user-defined UPSERTs to Oracle tables: $APT_ORAUPSERT_COMMIT_ROW_INTERVAL=10000 $APT_ORAUPSERT_COMMIT_TIME_INTERVAL=10 It seems that these values are being ignored. I've tried running with just the time-based or row-based settings and i...
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:21 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DSPROJECTNAME in Sequencer
- Replies: 1
- Views: 722
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Basic transformer functionality
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1451
I do not think that the BASIC transform stage works the same way in a PX job, since in server jobs the transform stage takes care of reject handling; whereas in PX the database stage itself does that through an output link. This explains your problems and I don't think that there will be a way to do...
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:04 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: FTP issue from ETL Server to Mainframe
- Replies: 2
- Views: 647
You are probably doing an ASCII (as opposed to a BINARY) ftp. If you file contains only text then this should be OK, as it will convert from your ASCII server to the mainframe's EBCDIC and it ought to be conserving the line length. You can try adding a "BINARY on" to your FTP commands and see if the...
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:57 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem in Dataset Reading
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1375
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Removing Control and Non-ASCII characters
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12412
The Ab Initio code looks like a direct interlude to the unix tr command; which you can use as a filter in the source sequential stage. The syntax of the DataStage CONVERT function is very different, you explicitly specify two strings, and each position value in one string is convert to the value in ...
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:46 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Special character  getting trimmed in DataStage
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10256
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:42 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: can we call routine in the Transformer stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1466