Search found 15603 matches
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Issue with Oracle 8 to Oracle 9i conversion Routine
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1570
The error message states "read-only file"; so either the umask for files you create doesn't allow you to the the files (rather unlikely) or to code is trying to clear a file which someone else created and you don't have "R" access to. Check access rights to files in your project directory, which is ...
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Flat file versus database for lookups
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1375
There is no benefit in duplicating the data in a flat file. Also, if your table is partitioned you might actually get better throughput from the parallel database access than by using a single-threaded sequential file. I don't think that sorting would make a difference here. Luckily, all of these qu...
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: ISSUE WHILE CONNECTING ORACLE
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2563
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Issue with Oracle 8 to Oracle 9i conversion Routine
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1570
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:09 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: migrating a mainframe job to parallel job?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 903
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Insert not happening when the job is run through sequencer
- Replies: 4
- Views: 799
Compare the director log entries for the parameters between the manual run and the job sequencer. A job will not "know" that it was started from a job sequence so there should be absolutely no difference between runs. Change your Oracle output stage to have a reject link and find out the reject reas...
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:04 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: migrating a mainframe job to parallel job?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 903
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:02 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: String To Timestamp
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1137
When column In.Datefield is '01/25/2008' then the derivation is
Code: Select all
StringToTimestamp(In.Datefield:' 00:00:00','%dd/%mm/%yyyy %hh:%nn:%ss')- Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Is there a util or technique to delete several hundred Jobs?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1260
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error while using MQ Connector stage
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3172
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Insert not happening when the job is run through sequencer
- Replies: 4
- Views: 799
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:38 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: MQ Connector- Selective reading- Aborted with error
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4965
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Flat file versus database for lookups
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1375
If you limiting yourself to a lookup stage, then you have 2 phases - the first is getting the data from the source system into DataStage and the second is applying the lookup query to that result set. Phase 2 will be identical regardless of source (assuming you don't try a sparse lookup). The sequen...
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: converting string to timestamp
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1368
swathi Singamareddygari wrote:StringToTimestamp(svr,'%yyyy-%mm-%dd %hh:%nn:%ss')
What you are doing cannot work. Your string picture is in absolutely no way compatible with the decimal numbers you listed. You are telling DataStage to convert the number "85363200" into a date formatted
as listed above?
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:44 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: CONVERT TIMESTAMP TO USER DEFINED DATE FORMAT
- Replies: 1
- Views: 548