Search found 15603 matches
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:42 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: FTP Excel File
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6687
As Craig has already pointed out, using FTP as a source means that the remote FTP server has to read the file, and FTP is limited to flat files. You can FTP the Excel file (in binary mode, as mentioned earlier) to your DataStage Server and then use ODBC connectivity to read the data from the Excel f...
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel routine appears to have a memory leak
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9561
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel routine appears to have a memory leak
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9561
Phil, I see what you mean and yes, the malloc()d space for the return pointer value may be the culprit - but on the other hand DataStage may be free()ing up that allocated space. Since the reference in a free() call is a void pointer it could be done within DataStage. Although in c++ don't return va...
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: FTP Excel File
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6687
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:06 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: FTP Excel File
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6687
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:00 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel routine appears to have a memory leak
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9561
In writing custom build-ops and operators I've found that the only place with potential for memory leak is when using the builtin pointers to input record contents. These are not allocated on a word boundary as would be the case with malloc() and the like and thus these record buffers are difficult ...
- Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Changing OPT_CONFIG_FILE and Duplicate data
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2007
- Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:58 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Error while running job after editing dsenv
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7022
*edit* If you look at one of the first entries in your log, you will see the runtime settings of the environment variables. It might be a good idea to compare those values with the ones in the dsenv file; particularly if a line break is in there as Craig hinted at being possible. *edit* What did you...
- Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Changing OPT_CONFIG_FILE and Duplicate data
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2007
- Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: RDBMS Code:5356 in Datastage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2145
- Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:18 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: View Server side trace files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1229
- Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Auto deletion of temporary files from Scratch disk
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2006
- Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Record Length of a sequential file
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1452
...8.7 does not support variable length of records. Only fixed length of record... No, that is incorrect. If you do not specify a length then the record is deemed to be of variable length. If your column specifications include variable length fields (i.e. VarChar() ), then the file is deemed to be ...
- Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:42 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Unable to read Timestamp(6) in Oracle Stage
- Replies: 1
- Views: 914
- Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Number of readers per node --
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7657