Search found 15603 matches
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error while running with 4 nodes
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2446
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:14 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Records Loading Decreases as the job Progresses
- Replies: 4
- Views: 895
If you change your constraint so that no records are being written to DB/2 I think you will see that your read speed stays constant. If not, you need to check with your DB/2 DBA. What stage are you using to write to your DB/2 table and what method are you using (insert, upsert, update)? Is the targe...
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Auto Purge is leaving Job logs behind
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5439
The auto purge settings are defaulted from the project level settings but can be overwritten on a per job basis. This might be what has happened in some cases in your installation. I wrote a small routine to overwrite and reset all the settings in a project at this site as they had similar issues an...
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error while running with 4 nodes
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2446
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:30 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Auto Purge is leaving Job logs behind
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5439
The log files are only purged according to the settings when a job is run; i.e. if you have a large log file for job ABC it will not get purged until ABC is run again. This is a common cause for using up lots of disk space for some test jobs that were only run once or twice with lots of warnings or ...
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error, running with 4 nodes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 824
Why did you post 2 identical new questions when you already have a current thread on the same error message and same subject? That will not get you any quicker or better answers.
This is the active thread that should be responded to
This is the active thread that should be responded to
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Routine does not produce desired o/p in datastage job
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3335
It would make the code readable if you were to use some indentation. I assume that you meant the routine is working correctly when you test it within the manager but not returning anything in the job. The first thing to do is to put some debugging code into your routine, at least at the beginning. S...
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 12:35 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Selection Parameters of Server and Parellel jobs
- Replies: 2
- Views: 976
There are many factors that affect the choice of what type of job type to choose. I'll just list 3: 1. Is the rest of the project or even installation done in one type or the other? 2. Is the amount of data to be processed very small, or would it run in a couple of seconds in a server job? 3. Does t...
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 12:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to check we have UNIX based ODBC driver for excel
- Replies: 2
- Views: 898
- Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:12 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Cobol COMP field Issue in DS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3710
- Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Cobol COMP field Issue in DS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3710
Vijay, don't you think that copying a premium post in full is not ethical? Also, COBOL fields that are COMP utational and not DISPLAY are the same in ASCII and EBCDIC as they are binary and have nothing to do with character sets. There is no reason to use a CFF stage in this case. There is nothing a...
- Sun Apr 23, 2006 5:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: type 2 implementaion in update problem
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1165
- Sat Apr 22, 2006 10:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Cobol COMP field Issue in DS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3710
Your data and metadata are not in synch. I don't know how you have loaded your file's metadata into the repository, but the COMPutational part did not get set correctly. You need to edit the file's definition in the manager (right mouse-click on the column(s) in question, "edit row" and set the data...
- Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 Binary Error
- Replies: 1
- Views: 702
- Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Selecting max Date Record
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1092