Search found 15603 matches
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Format Delimiter ascii 168 (¿)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5165
Caltog, per my previous post - can you see if this is reproduceable with a job that has just your read and a write stage? I just wrote a test job going back and forth using 168 and normal commas as separators and cannot reproduce the problem you are having. Have you checked to make sure you are usin...
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:17 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Modify Stage - Combining Commands
- Replies: 2
- Views: 736
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: MetaData Mismatch Warning
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6086
Where are you using "SUM(AMT)"? It sounds like a new column in your SQL query - and the metadata of that new column is most likely creating it as a nullable column. If you change your metadata for this column to be not nullable but add a null default handler in your row definition the error will go ...
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:55 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: MetaData Mismatch Warning
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6086
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:56 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: MetaData Mismatch Warning
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6086
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:54 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Pass valus to UNIX script fromDS control job
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1711
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:44 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: MetaData Mismatch Warning
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6086
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:18 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Format Delimiter ascii 168 (¿)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5165
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:14 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: MetaData Mismatch Warning
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6086
Where did you check the metadata? Using the DB's describe or the DS Manager isn't going to help. You need to start at the source stage in the columns tab and for that column right-mouse-click-edit-row to see what is set. Then do that for each stage to make sure you haven't changed those attributes i...
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Plug in
- Replies: 1
- Views: 606
The FTP plugin in DataStage will transfer files and data content. There is no need for a model - if you drop the FTP plugin stage onto the canvas in your Designer you will see that most of the options are similar to those you would use in an interactive FTP session. In addition, you can always call ...
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:09 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: script error
- Replies: 2
- Views: 789
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:45 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: MetaData Mismatch Warning
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6086
If you check carefully in your source definition for the column "AMT" you will find that it is declared as nullable, hence that warning message. Whether the actual column is declared as nullable or not in the database is a different matter, but DataStage is reporting the potential problem based on t...
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:40 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Pass valus to UNIX script fromDS control job
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1711
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:35 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Invocation Id
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1579
- Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: IPC Buffer Size not exceeding 1024Kb
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1516
The lower level definition will take precedence. But setting a buffer to such a high value will have no benefit to job speed at all, in fact it might even cause the job to run slower. to quote myself from some thread a long time ago: ...you might not be using explicit IPC stages, but by specifying i...