Search found 42189 matches
- Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:53 am
- Forum: Site/Forum
- Topic: DSXChange forum software "Search" functionality
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3020
Walter Hardeman explained this awhile ago... probably before your time began here, Grasshopper. It may have something to do with the fact that, once a word has pased a certain usage threshold, it will no longer show up in the normal search. It's built into the forum software to prevent massive hits ...
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Remove Duplicates from Sequential File
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7323
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:27 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Very basic license question
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3806
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:21 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Remove Duplicates from Sequential File
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7323
Sorry, just itching for a chance to say that back at you. :D sometimes it takes a long time for my posts to get through. Odd.. yours was posted what seems to be over an hour later. That may also explain why sometimes other people come in later and repeat almost the same thing the previous poster sai...
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Hash file lookup and simultaneous update
- Replies: 22
- Views: 6195
Chullet, you hit the nail right on the head. I need to use the UV stage b/c I'm doing a LEFT JOIN with another Hash file but that besides the point. Not necessarily beside the point. Sounds like you could simply stream the first hash file into the job and then do a lookup to the second hash, constr...
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ODBC stage array size & number of record in the file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1157
Re: ODBC stage array size & number of record in the file
KKCAA wrote:Any suggestion to this issue is appreciated.
Bulk Loader?
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:56 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Very basic license question
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3806
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Add a number of days to a Date in PX job
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1692
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:51 pm
- Forum: Site/Forum
- Topic: DataStage Release in postings
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2591
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Very basic license question
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3806
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Observation on comparing @NULL
- Replies: 4
- Views: 890
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Hash file lookup and simultaneous update
- Replies: 22
- Views: 6195
Re: Update to Hash instead of UV
The hash stage on the other hand appears to delete hash file completely and then loads it with the records from the XFM output constaint of Not(NOTFOUND), which is not what I want. Only if you tell it to! Make sure you don't have the 'Clear file before writing' option checked and that you are writt...
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Regarding reject rows option
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1181
You are going to have to do what Phil mentions if you want any idea of which link rejected your row. Create a field in your reject output and, in its derivation, check your contraints in order. The first one that matches is the one that bounced your row. You can also check the 'rejected' status of e...
- Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:02 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: capture warning message
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5363
- Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:49 pm
- Forum: Site/Forum
- Topic: Required fields no longer required?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3865
Required fields no longer required?
Why suddenly do we have several postings in (at the very least) the Server forum with none of the 'required' information? 