Search found 42189 matches
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Version Control life cycle
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1865
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Version Control life cycle
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1865
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Version Control life cycle
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1865
Going through this myself right now. Deletes are a PITA in Version Control. When jobs get renamed you end up with old and new names in VC and no good way to deal as it never really deletes anything. HOWEVER, I was under the impression you could: a) Allow logical 'deletes' to happen via the 'Allow Co...
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Problem with sequencer. It freezes my computer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1841
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Job Started but Nothing is Done!
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1840
Welcome aboard. Unfortunately, I've seen the same behaviour in the past in v6, opened a case with Ascential and never got a resolution. Biggest impediment being the fact that the problem is not reproducible. If it is like what I saw (from memory) the Status view made it look like the job never ran. ...
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 12:58 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Cannot Copy Stage from One Job to other
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1229
- Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Wrong Routine value returned
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1625
- Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:20 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ORA-01036: illegal variable name/number
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7693
- Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: installing two different version of DS client
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1919
- Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:12 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: User-Defined SQL behaves differently in 7.5.1A
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3702
Just wanted to followup on this as the possibility of this being a problem has been haunting me... I have 7.5.1A installed on an HP/UX test server right now, putting things through their paces. I can find no problems when using heavily commented User Defined SQL in our weapon of choice - the OCI sta...
- Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: installing two different version of DS client
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1919
- Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Oracle Library
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1986
Have you been using Oracle stages up to this point and are now using a new stage (like OracBulk) or have you yet to get any Oracle stages working? On a UNIX server, it is configured in the dsenv file. There should be a Plug-In Configuration Guide which should walk you through the changes needed. Bas...
- Tue Aug 23, 2005 3:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: job sequence
- Replies: 4
- Views: 910
- Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to manually set the jobstatus of a job
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1248
Re: How to manually set the jobstatus of a job
I need to manually set the Jobstatus of the current job to aborted You can't manually set it, so put that approach out of your head. What you can do is build a routine to read the file which you can execute via the Routine Activity stage between the two jobs. Abort the routine (ie, call DSLogFatal)...
- Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:48 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: unable to read from a hash file...
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3881
Does this mean that the hash file has null values in it? if so, what would be my next step in the process to debug the issue... No, it means the fields returned by the lookup will be null - not the data in the hashed file itself. So, yes, time to dig in and start debugging why the lookup is failing...