DSXchange

Ummm... moving them to another directory? An 'archive' one would be typical. Harder would be to keep a list of filenames processed and skip those filenames when you see them again.

I was wondering the same thing, but all that's been mentioned is a single server. Pavan, can you confirm?

I doubt you'll find much experience with Notes ODBC issues here, unfortunately. Where did this driver come from? Do they offer support for it?

And the setting for that property would be... ? Not all methods allow reject capture.

It's probably not set there at all. Try what Arnd suggested first.

If you overwrite the previous dataset each time, loading it empty should not be an issue. Is there some reason you cannot simply do that?

Is it just a direct export-import. Would all the stages work properly after importing to the new 8.1. The short answer is 'yes', this would be a direct export/import and everything in 7.x should still work in 8.x without issue. This is provided, of course, that all 'optional' stages you are using i...

Then you either need to rename the file once processed so it no longer matches your pattern, or you need to move it to another directory.

Use the File Pattern option in the stage.

Seeing as how this happens with newly created jobs as well, I don't see how...

Sounds like you may just need to make sure you have 'overwrite' turned on.

I can see your 'newness' from your post count and no, I'm not disturbed any more than I normally am. Forum etiquette asks that you please start your own thread for your own questions rather than hi-jacking someone else's and when you do, we would be happy to provide information.

I assume it would as well, just more wondering if you knew seeing as how it wasn't listed as an 'official' supported operating system on the link you provided. Then there's always the Windows 7 question nowadays as well.

Use a sequence job to check either the size of the dataset or how many rows were written to it in the previous job and then only run the second job when that comes back non-zero.

OK. That's better than it being an 8.0.something version with all the possible bugs that brings to the table. However, for the behaviour you're describing I would open a case with your official support provider. Do you think the 'user-defined routine' plays any role in this? When you have this probl...