DSXchange

As noted, remove them if you don't want them in the final output:

prasad v wrote:Hi Chulett,

Unfortunately i have created this thread in General forum. Can you please move this thread to Parallel extender forum.

Done.

I'm not really sure, hence my lack of specifics in the hope someone else would respond. We know sometimes there's a concurrent license issue if we are talking jobs with transformer stages - i.e. only one C++ compile at a time is allowed so it's not that it takes longer to do the actual compile but r...

There are several posts here on the subject of "RTLogging", for example one here. That won't help speed up compiles, however. Nor would reindexing.

Always good to make sure you are up-to-date on fixpacks.

That's a very old piece of information related to the fact that installing Service Pack 2 for Windows XP broke certain things in DataStage. Seeing as how SP2 was released seven years ago, I doubt it caused your issue. I'm sure there would have been a less drastic solution but restoring your last O/S...

Those would be a "file descriptor" much like a handle. I don't have time to do this reply the proper justice it needs but a google on the subject of reading files in shell using file descriptors should help. Andy did say "something like this" when he posted it from what I recall,...

What is going on? What is making you feel that you need to 'reindex' anything?

D'oh! For some reason when I transcribed a post I found on the subject, I ended up typing 'installed' when it said 'activated'.

You can help you. An exact search for "because of a prior component with the same name" will find how other people have solved that problem. The last error should be self-explanatory, but you could also search for it here and google will turn it up as well.

To me, that would imply that you've never had a lookup fail before, something hard to believe. That or your looked up fields weren't targeting required fields in a database.

Seyed wrote:Assuming that attempts are made to first insert the rejected data into the Oracle table and then to the rejected file

ps. Not an assumption... How It Works.

Be proactive rather than reactive - make sure your required fields are non-null before sending the row off to the database.

Without posting your actual full error messages, I'm assuming what you are seeing are the records first being written to the database where they are rejected for the reason you noted and which are then written to the reject link.

Let's get you into your own post rather than riding on the coattails of a three year old one. FYI, it had a subject of "About Section Leaders" hence Ray's reply.