Search found 42189 matches
- Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:47 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: DataStage objects got disappeared from designer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6423
- Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:45 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: DataStage objects got disappeared from designer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6423
- Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:29 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Remove ASCII Code 160 in transformer
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4476
- Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:41 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: XML stage error
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2397
- Thu Aug 31, 2017 8:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Remove ASCII Code 160 in transformer
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4476
- Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:39 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Ascential DataStage Multiple Security Issues
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2097
- Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:59 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Ascential DataStage Multiple Security Issues
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2097
- Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Invalid characters by using CLOB
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2272
Guess so.
Perhaps this Technote might help with your block size issue. I'm also curious if you only include 1 CLOB field rather than 2, does it then work? And I also seem to remember something about it needing to be the last column in the list...
Perhaps this Technote might help with your block size issue. I'm also curious if you only include 1 CLOB field rather than 2, does it then work? And I also seem to remember something about it needing to be the last column in the list...
- Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:27 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Calling the same job multiple times in parallel
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3568
- Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:11 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: YTD BASED ON THE MONTH NUMBER
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3658
Hmmm... okay, if you say so. I found what seemed to be a number of valid answers, even if some of them were for SQL Server. At its core, SQL is SQL in spite of Oracle's sometimes unique take on the subject, so they can apply to Oracle as much as any other SQL-based solution. You might want to explai...
- Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:38 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: YTD BASED ON THE MONTH NUMBER
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3658
- Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sequence number using Surrogate Key in transformer
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4024
It's not a random number. If your requirement does not allow any gaps in the sequence number then you cannot leverage anything related to Surrogate Keys for this as they will have numbering gaps as 'missing' or skipped keys are a normal part of surrogates. Now, there may be a way to get it to do tha...
- Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Complex Flat File trimming trailing blanks
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1814
- Mon Aug 28, 2017 4:00 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: DataStage objects got disappeared from designer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6423
- Mon Aug 28, 2017 3:24 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: DataStage objects got disappeared from designer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6423