Search found 3045 matches
- Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:26 pm
- Forum: Data Integration
- Topic: Good grief, have you seen Ascential World's new name?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4325
On the plus side the conference has been extended an extra half day, sessions are longer going to 60 or 90 minutes for more in depth discussion, product demos have been moved into the partner pavilion instead of being in a seperate room and there are more training options following the conference. L...
- Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:12 pm
- Forum: Data Integration
- Topic: Good grief, have you seen Ascential World's new name?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4325
Good grief, have you seen Ascential World's new name?
AscentialWorld 2005 has been renamed to IBM Information Integration Live! That's their exclamation mark, not mine. I guess they are trying to make it seem like American Idol. It's Live! On Stage! There is nothing more exciting in the world then watching information integration Live! Look at that dat...
- Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:27 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: abt db2 EE
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2987
Set the environment variable $APT_DUMP_SCORE to true within your job to get better Director log messages. As previously noted post your config file. Have you tried testing the same job writing to a copy stage (save job under a new name, remove all stages except DB2 and add a copy stage). This is a u...
- Fri Jul 15, 2005 6:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: PX warnings : SortMerge
- Replies: 4
- Views: 911
- Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:53 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: PX warnings : SortMerge
- Replies: 4
- Views: 911
To answer your second question the best practice is to deliver jobs to production that have no warnings during normal operation. You need to minimise warnings within the jobs through design and testing, you need to downgrade unavoidable warnings using a Message Handler (see the FAQ). It is very dang...
- Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:47 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Why can't I use input column in a lookup condition?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 972
This has been submitted to Ascential as a GUI bug after being reproduced by support. Sometimes the Input Column field is greyed out. It can be fixed by unlinking the reference link and linking it again. It can also be fixed by shuffling links on the input link order tab (if you have more then one re...
- Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:18 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Issues with metadata copied from server job
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1665
- Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:58 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to capture warnings from Log
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1715
- Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: WHERE vs JOIN
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1047
The first syntax a limited ANSI standard, the second statement is the full ANSI standard and I always go for it if the RDBMS engine supports it. I think it is far more maintainable and less likely to give incorrect results through to coding errors. It takes you down the path of joining each table in...
- Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Performance Metrics from commandline
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1650
I think you are barking up the wrong tree. The CPU % utilisation is not nearly as important as how long the job takes. Who cares about a 100% utilisation job that takes 3 seconds? Just work out what jobs are on your processing critical path, work out which ones are taking the longest and plan to reb...
- Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: wrapped stage
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1177
You cannot view data using the PROJDEF or ENV parameter values, they just don't work within the Designer session. A bit of a bug in the product if you ask me. The only way to view data is to replace these values with the real values each time you view data or use normal job parameters in the paralle...
- Mon Jul 11, 2005 6:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DataStage 7.5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1640
There is a sticky forum message on this over at the Ascential devnet DataStage forum.
http://developernet.ascential.com/home.php
http://developernet.ascential.com/home.php
- Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Cannot compile Job Sequence or Create new template
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1511
- Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Performance question
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1452
I have found parallel jobs to have more stages in them then server jobs. Better performance is achieved by not writing to disk so our jobs try to carry the data further. There is also a tendency to move functions away from external products such as the RDBMS engine and Unix scripts into parallel sta...
- Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm
- Forum:
- Topic: Manage Business Metadata using MetaStage
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8809
Erwin is fine for capturing the business rules on static data. But is it any good for capturing transformation business rules? We use Erwin to create our data model and add column descriptions to all tables, we push these into DB2, we then import the DB2 schema into DataStage. The column definitions...