Search found 4992 matches
- Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Datastage running slow due to multi instance issues
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2252
- Mon Oct 03, 2005 9:58 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: updating oracle table
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1139
Create a table with the same column definitions as your load data and enable for parallel query. Bulk load your data into the work table using DIRECT path option and TRUNCATE method. Create an index on your update key (should be unique, hopefully you're not doing wildcard updates). Analyze your tabl...
- Sun Oct 02, 2005 7:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: CPU usage question
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1018
There are multiple ways to use multiple cpus in the same job. 1. Have independent streams of logic. Ex: seq1a--->xfm1--->seq1b seq2a--->xfm2--->seq2b This will cause xfm1 and xfm2 to operate independently as streams and use 2 cpus. 2. Have chained active stages and enable inter-process row buffering...
- Sun Oct 02, 2005 7:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: dis-advantages of SCD`s
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1114
In a real time scenario, an SCD can become a critical timing issue. Imagine you have a queue of database transactions waiting to be processed. This queue contains rows of data that feed both dimension and fact tables. If the rows are time sequenced according to their updated time, then you can feel ...
- Fri Sep 30, 2005 9:46 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ExecSH File not found (not permissions)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 772
- Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Can we use any other stage other than MSOLEDB
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1463
- Thu Sep 29, 2005 2:52 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: sort on character in descending order
- Replies: 3
- Views: 572
I think the r for descending order goes after a key's notation:
Code: Select all
sort -k 1.1,1.3r -k 1.4,1.6n file1 > file2- Thu Sep 29, 2005 1:44 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: sort on character in descending order
- Replies: 3
- Views: 572
Do you mean with a Unix sort command or the Sort stage? For the command line, specify the sort key using byte notation and sort order along with data type for left/right sorting. For the Sort stage (really just a wrapper over the Unix sort command), create two columns that represent the data for eac...
- Thu Sep 29, 2005 1:41 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Can we use any other stage other than MSOLEDB
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1463
- Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: compiling jobs in datastage 6x
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4355
- Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Universe Editor
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1219
Column definitions are irrelevant unless you're using the UV/ODBC stage on the hash file. Hash files are content agnostic, there are no table definitions unless you want the hash file to be treated as a table. If so, your standard SQL DDL will create a hash file with a relational layer over it to al...
- Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:21 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Oracle module could not be found
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2096
- Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:18 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Oracle module could not be found
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2096
- Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:42 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Parameters defined in terms of other parameters
- Replies: 2
- Views: 808
- Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Hash File Concurrency
- Replies: 3
- Views: 776
Actually, as long as the jobs are not trying to clear the hash file while others are writing to it, you're fine to have multiple jobs streaming output to the same hash file. You'll have to be aware that the same row being written to the file by different jobs will not be the best design, because you...