Search found 3835 matches

by eostic
Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:13 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XML Stage Convert from Old v6.1 to new V8.1
Replies: 29
Views: 10346

as noted above, the column with "parts" should be your key, if that's the node that repeats underneath service-order. Your xpath looks syntactically correct, but only you can know your data. It should work, provided that "parts" is the only sub-node that repeats under service-ord...
by eostic
Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:39 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XML Stage Convert from Old v6.1 to new V8.1
Replies: 29
Views: 10346

sounds to me like you don't want a "value" in the service-order element? If so, just delete the column from the link.

Ernie
by eostic
Thu Sep 15, 2011 2:04 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XML Stage Convert from Old v6.1 to new V8.1
Replies: 29
Views: 10346

Parts repeats "under" service-order, doesn't it? If so, then THAT's the single column that needs to be "key"...(repetition element -- it doesn't mean that it is a key, per se).

Ernie
by eostic
Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:28 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
Topic: Out Of Memory Error in Web Service Transformer
Replies: 4
Views: 5571

Excellent and congrats! ...perhaps you can pass along the syntax you used in this thread for future reference.....I usually just google it when I need it, but it would be good to have in here ...Thanks!!

Ernie
by eostic
Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:26 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: xml performance
Replies: 13
Views: 3232

No way to directly convert them, but the methodology is similar, so you shouldn't have too much difficulty, and the syntax of the xmlStage is identical. Save the output link definition for your xmlInput stage in EE to a tabledef and you can then just "load" that into the output link of you...
by eostic
Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:42 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
Topic: Out Of Memory Error in Web Service Transformer
Replies: 4
Views: 5571

You can try playing with the heap size for the jvm....use your right mouse on the WS Stage and select "grid style"....then look for the jvm settings and pass along whatever jvm values you want for things like memory... (you'll have to look up the exact syntax)....

Ernie
by eostic
Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:40 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
Topic: WAS docs and web service security questions
Replies: 6
Views: 4262

The good news is that you won't have to become a java developer....though you will ultimately be learning more about the configuration files within a WebSphere EJB application.......in the end, though the edits are mostly textual inside of xml documents.......

Ernie
by eostic
Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:20 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
Topic: WAS docs and web service security questions
Replies: 6
Views: 4262

It not in the GUI today.....I suppose you could open an enhancement, but really, it's not "that"hard to do. It will take time as I said, and some testing, but it's all fully supported and documented within WAS..... I haven't done it in several years since we researched and wrote that docum...
by eostic
Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:52 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
Topic: WAS docs and web service security questions
Replies: 6
Views: 4262

There is no way to "isolate" ISD role based users. I will assume that you have already found the HTTP authentication check box when designing your service...this allows you to require authentication, and then have only users with an ISD Consumer Role to be able to invoke them. If you need ...
by eostic
Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:47 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: xml performance
Replies: 13
Views: 3232

Absolutely. If they are that simple, chances are they run in less than 1 second, and the overhead is just EE Job Start up time.

Ernie
by eostic
Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:34 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
Topic: MQ Connector Usage in an always-on Job
Replies: 16
Views: 16161

...been a long time since I've worked with dsjob.....I'll wait for someone else to chime in here --- but isn't it possible to do dsjob invocation with a "no wait" ?

Ernie
by eostic
Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:17 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XML Stage Convert from Old v6.1 to new V8.1
Replies: 29
Views: 10346

I hope you have gone to a whole new tabledef imported as above...you need to have no "xml" data elements...there is too much potential that they will mess things up.
by eostic
Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:01 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XML Stage Convert from Old v6.1 to new V8.1
Replies: 29
Views: 10346

hmm. Had a chance to look more closely at your metadata. Looking closely, I see that you have, under "claims", "claim-audit-information" and also "service-order" information. In the final document that you "want", do each of those nodes repeat? ...or perhaps i...
by eostic
Tue Sep 13, 2011 3:13 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XML Stage Convert from Old v6.1 to new V8.1
Replies: 29
Views: 10346

Hi Mandyli... I appreciate your efforts to use your job and do the conversion from xmlWriter to xmlOutput "as is"...but it won't work that simply...there are too many dependencies. You are close, yet there are still various things that I suspect may be causing difficulties. It's hard to te...
by eostic
Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:43 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XML Stage Convert from Old v6.1 to new V8.1
Replies: 29
Views: 10346

check the descriptions carefully...they should all be identical in xpath at the beginning..... does your first column have TPIINFO in the beginning as in your entry below? ...every column's description needs to start consistently..... like with /claims/.../etc. And in addition to the key, perhaps on...