Search found 53125 matches
- Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:34 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Command Interface
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4298
Would I be right in saying that LIST.LOCKS never shows any locks held? That's because - unless you've chosen to use them within your own routines - task synchronization locks are not used by DataStage. All user locks used by DataStage processes and clients can be viewed with LIST.READU EVERY. In mos...
- Fri Feb 04, 2005 7:45 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Function to round a decimal to highest possible integer
- Replies: 13
- Views: 12347
- Fri Feb 04, 2005 7:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: link report not found
- Replies: 13
- Views: 14127
- Fri Feb 04, 2005 7:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Testing with null arguements
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2167
Every developer I mentor gets the following advice. Include conditionally compiled statements for test. * Change this to $UNDEFINE when compiling for production. $DEFINE TESTING This sets up a token that can be tested by the compiler. $IFDEF TESTING statements $ENDIF The statements between the $IFDE...
- Fri Feb 04, 2005 7:16 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Derived parameters
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3142
- Fri Feb 04, 2005 7:13 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to check how many clients are connected to the project?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1935
Actually, being connected will not prevent an export; it's only when they have objects open for editing that that object is skipped by the export process. It is sufficient, therefore, to check for locked design objects (though safer not to have any user connected). You can determine both using the c...
- Fri Feb 04, 2005 7:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Command Interface
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4298
LIST.LOCKS is not the appropriate command; this shows task synchronization locks, which are not used by DataStage. LIST.FILE.STATS will be singularly unhelpful unless the statistics have first been gathered using ACCOUNT.FILE.STATS. As you can discern, there is much to learn, and much of which you s...
- Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: java calling a datastage job
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2197
There is a C-callable API (called DSAPI) documented in both the Server Job Developer's Guide and the Parallel Job Developer's Guide . While there is no explicit Java API, or set of classes, I'm sure you could make use of the DSAPI from Java. But it won't make your work easier. Instead of leveraging ...
- Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:15 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Inconsistent run times
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1350
Umm... only run it on the occasions when it runs in three seconds? Check the log file and compare the job start and finish times with the active stage start and finish times. This will isolate the problem better. When you run the job from Director, switch to the Tracing tab. Select the Transformer s...
- Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Datastage malfunction while adding a number to a huge number
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2107
You can find it in the DataStage BASIC manual. It is a valid function: though your expression remains red it will compile and run successfully. If you want to switch off the red colour, which only signifies that the expression editor does not recognize the function name, edit the file called DSParam...
- Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: time stamp concatenation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 737
- Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Datastage malfunction while adding a number to a huge number
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2107
- Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Inconsistant behaviour when using arrays
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2053
You can get around the problem of redimensioning in COMMON (which is prohibited) by using a dynamic array (or, in your case, a pair of them, one for the lower bound, one for the upper bound). I have used this technique in the past, and it is (used to be?) taught on the Programming with DataStage BAS...
- Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:54 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DS Server edition/ DS EE edition
- Replies: 4
- Views: 962
All job types are accessed, and modified, by the one set of DataStage clients. The clients determine from the repository what job types you can create which, in turn, is determined by what version of DataStage server engine you have installed (server, EE or EE/MVS). All engines can create server job...
- Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:45 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Schema management
- Replies: 3
- Views: 888
The staff at DSXChange forward all requests to Ascential. I am not sure what happens after that. There's also an enhancements wish list at Ascential Developer Net as well as which you are perfectly entitled to submit enhancement requests through your support provider. Finally, if you have a local us...