Search found 53125 matches
- Tue Jun 04, 2013 12:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ERROR WHILE QUERYING FROM DS TABLES IN UNIVERSE STAGE
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2294
Source and target stage are not in the same DS_JOBOBJECTS record, as you've noticed. It might be a better approach to UNION two queries (one for source stages and one for target stages). The technically correct approach is to determine the link records in DS_JOBOBJECTS, on which the DSRIDs of the st...
- Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:42 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Active Active topology - IS 8.5/7
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1347
- Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:40 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: APT_CONFIG_file for information server director job
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1126
Let's begin with the second question. The number of warnings before the job aborts is an option that can be specified in Director or at run time (for example the -warn option of the dsjob command). There is no real reason to run ISD jobs in sequential mode although, fairly clearly, it's sensible to ...
- Mon Jun 03, 2013 2:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Hashed File stage Lookup propertry in server job
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4493
- Mon Jun 03, 2013 2:03 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Subversion in DataStage
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4544
- Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Invali Argu Value -Missing Warning thrown
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2246
- Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:15 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Searching in &COMO&
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1449
- Sun Jun 02, 2013 11:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Handling ASCII VALUE
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2834
- Sun Jun 02, 2013 11:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Getting Maximum Date using Aggregator, double to date how?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1599
- Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:01 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Latest record to survive
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5822
Not really. Keep in mind what a survive rule is doing; it's specifying a condition under which a field in the currect (c) record will replace that field in the so-far-the-best (b) record. Median couldn't easily be supported, particularly when many steps are involved in the survive rule, since the me...
- Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:19 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Latest record to survive
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5822
- Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:10 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Handling ASCII VALUE
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2834
- Sat Jun 01, 2013 3:23 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Subversion in DataStage
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4544
- Sat Jun 01, 2013 2:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: derive max occurrence
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1805
- Sat Jun 01, 2013 2:22 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: derive max occurrence
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1805
Shouldn't the result be KEY1 KEY2 VALUE1 VALUE2 VALUE3 A Z 10 50 20 B Y 100 5 1 You should be able to use an Aggregator stage for this. Group by KEY1 and KEY2 (not forgetting to partition by KEY1) and calculate MAX for each of VALUE1, VALUE2 and VALUE3. To keep them as integers, assert Preserve Type...