Search found 53125 matches
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problems with dsjob running VERY slow
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3741
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:57 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: UNIX and project permissions for multi-users
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2469
All DataStage user belong to one group, which gives them access to the DataStage software. There is a separate group for each project. Only the developers who need to access that project are members of that group. Any particular developer can belong to any combination of groups. Protect the DataStag...
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:54 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Autosys Job
- Replies: 14
- Views: 10600
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Best approach for unknown varied source
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5646
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:51 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Unable to Read from Oracle Enterprise Stage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1439
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:49 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Hash Partitioning
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1109
What happens is entirely dependent upon the requirements of the downstream operator. If it's a regular (parallel) operator, with no requirement for partitioned input, Auto should use "Same". If there's no repartitioning icon on the link, you can be comfortable that this is the case. But if you want ...
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:47 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem with join stage and compilation error
- Replies: 2
- Views: 964
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:45 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: This Item has no deign time information
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1264
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:43 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: problem in implementing pivot stage
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3024
I infer from your note that the error occurs when dragging a link from the Pivot stage to the downstream Oracle Enterprise stage. Is this correct? I was not able to reproduce this problem using version 7.5.1A. My guess is that you already have an output link from the Pivot stage (look carefully for ...
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:40 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: problem in implementing pivot stage
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3024
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:36 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Batch Password change?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3451
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: SQL for Last value in a universe field
- Replies: 3
- Views: 901
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Possibility of running many Mutiple Instances concurrently
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4076
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: pivot dyanmic user
- Replies: 2
- Views: 711
You have an ongoing thread on this topic, in which you will find an answer. The current thread is redundant.
- Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: IPC & Manageing resource contention
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2797
So with 8 dual node cpus, there are 16 processes available? Will the server dynamically adjust the number of processes when the second job is submitted or will test1 keep all the processes until it is finished? You're operating on an incorrect assumption. The number of processes available is not go...