Search found 53125 matches
- Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Creating 64 bit hash file
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5341
- Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: defining pools in the configuration file
- Replies: 1
- Views: 801
- Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Partitioning and repartitioning in a MPP
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1280
- Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:29 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: datastage server edition
- Replies: 3
- Views: 973
- Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: HOw to restore the cleanup project files???
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1936
- Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:25 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Creating 64 bit hash file
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5341
RESIZE is actually restartable these days. And the USING clause means you get two I/O channels rather than one. If you're really worried about locked, use CONCURRENT as well - that is also very robust. (Still avoid INPLACE though - that's a leftover from the days when 80MB was a lot of disk space an...
- Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:20 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: what is the max value in key management next value
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2086
First it means you're in the wrong forum. This is a question about a parallel job. Second it means that you've hijacked someone else's thread, with a totally unrelated question. That behaviour is severely frowned upon here. Third, you don't seem to realize that a wat is a Buddhist temple. Fourth, it...
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 5:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Stored Proc Issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 988
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 5:16 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Date Issue
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1306
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 5:07 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: New and need some quick help
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1117
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:41 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Sequencer parameters
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1442
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:40 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ORA-01036: illegal variable name/number
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2288
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: PIVOT STAGE
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1643
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Designer Client!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 875
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:51 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Routine returning weired value for calculating factorial
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4497
Just did the hashed file solution. It's pretty slick, though a really interesting exercise in tuning the hashed file. With GROUP.SIZE 2, LARGE.RECORD 1024, SEQ.NUM it did up to 1000! in 0.120 CPU seconds and 0.000 elapsed seconds (including creating the hashed file). Even stage tracing (microseconds...