You could begin by posting a server job question in the server job forum.
U is one of our other posters. I am not he.
Search found 53125 matches
- Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage TX
- Topic: generate the ETL elasedtime report Directly
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2636
- Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:10 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: qsMatchWeight returns 0
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1347
Missing values always contribute 0. The idea is that a missing value should prejudice neither the agreement weight nor the disagreement weight. Are there missing values in your records? A totally empty record except for the blocking fields, perhaps? An aggregate match weight of 0 is perfectly feasib...
- Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:08 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: QS v8 ruleset issue
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1735
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Lookup Stage VS Outer Join
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5311
You should also scrutinize (with an intense scruit) whether you really need all those columns and all those rows in your reference data set. For example, if all you are determining is existence, all you need is key columns. If you're mapping business to surrogate key, all you need is those two keys....
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:43 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Failed to enumerate domain groups
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3693
Of course, on Windows it doesn't have the leading dot, but does have its "hidden" attribute set. And, if you have not configured any security through DataStage roles, these files ARE absent - not missing. They only come into existence if you modify the role-based security in Administrator client. It...
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:40 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Reasons for moving to version 8 from 6.5
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2647
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Lookup Stage VS Outer Join
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5311
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: "Rebuild Repository indices"can do what?and when w
- Replies: 1
- Views: 986
Your DataStage Repository is a database schema in which your designs and runtime information are stored. Because it is a database schema it has database tables for storing these things. The tables are indexed. If the indexes ever lose synchronization, it becomes necessary to rebuild them. You should...
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:33 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Reasons for moving to version 8 from 6.5
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2647
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:45 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Ora_Xfr_seq- Date conversion
- Replies: 2
- Views: 890
Welcome aboard. :D Try it with no conversion at all, and see what you get in the target file. Post that result here, then we'll offer advice. You will probably need to apply an Iconv() function before using the Oconv() function, but exactly what form the second argument of each needs to take depends...
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Logic Question
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3588
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:29 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Detecting new line in a string
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1173
It would aid diagnosis were you to post the code of your routine. What makes you think that "lines" (presumably separate cells) in Excel have operating system terminators? Or they all in the one cell? For that matter, how is the set of values being obtained from Excel by your routine? Did you double...
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:21 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: query on Change_Capture
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1332
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: main_program: "same" operator may not have a parti
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3906
The message seems to imply that somewhere in the job there is an input link on which there is no partitioner/collector defined, or that Same has been selected as the partitioning/collecting algorithm but there is non-partitioned data arriving. For example, SeqFile (sequential) ----> AnyStage (parall...
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 4:25 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Abort the job from "After job subroutine"
- Replies: 21
- Views: 10455