Search found 53125 matches
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:45 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Invalid Julian day
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5536
Re: all i'm doing is extracting yyyy from dt1 ,mm ,dd from d
Hi I have two date fields. extracting years from dt1, month and date from dt2 ,format os dt fields are yyyy-mm-dd DSLink389.DT_CNTRCTL_MTY [1,4]:'-': DSLink389.DT_OPTN_BEG[6,2]:'-': DSLink389.DT_OPTN_BEG[9,2] and converting from StringToDate. . Are they truly date fields, or string? What is the dat...
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:42 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem with Change Capture stage
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2119
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:40 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Orchestrate Operator in Generic stage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2458
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:39 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Datastage ETL tool Market
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3797
Attribute your sources!!! I heard (on the BBC so it must be true) that gays cause earthquakes. I'd be more worried about that than IBM stopping DataStage in the foreseeable future. U does not log in very often, so is unlikely to forward anything any time soon. The second person personal pronoun in E...
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:24 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: The Phantom (flan flinger) strikes again
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2664
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic:
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4000
So what we were thinking here is that something was interfering with transfer of the rows from your Link Collector to your Sequential File stage. Calls to ds_ipcopen() come from the Link Collector stage, which is known to be a bit "flaky". Recall that the Link Collector stage establishes a process f...
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:18 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Orchestrate Operator in Generic stage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2458
Welcome aboard. It's the name of the Orchestrate operator that you want to invoke either in some non-standard way or because it's one of the (few) Orchestrate operators that is not already encapsulated in a DataStage stage. Documentation on Orchestrate operators can be found in the Orchestrate Opera...
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:14 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: The Phantom (flan flinger) strikes again
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2664
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:13 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic:
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4000
It does work. I just tested it. Here's what I see in the "job starting" event in the job log: Starting Job EnvVarParamTest. $SEASON = Spring [$PROJDEF] It correctly picks up the default value for the project, and annotates that as being because the $PROJDEF token was encountered. What more could you...
Then on what basis are you claiming that it's not being recognized? Look in the "job starting" event in the job log and report the values of job parameters being passed to the job. It may be, of course, that this mechanism does not work with server jobs, only with parallel jobs. That also would need...
- Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: please list me the constraints
- Replies: 3
- Views: 965
- Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: lookup anamolky
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3909
- Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Filter data based on emp_id
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4305
You do not need an Aggregator stage at all. Given sorted data, gradually building each row in a Transformer stage, and taking the last of each group (sort key value) in a Remove Duplicates stage, is a sufficient solution to the original problem (which did not drop row 102). To drop rows with no non-...
- Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:08 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: lookup file sets
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1255
The reference data are always loaded into memory, except in the (rare) case of a sparse lookup. The only speed gain a Lookup File Set offers is that the index to those data is pre-built and does not need to be built "on the fly" by the LUT_CreateOp operator. However, even 17 million rows is not that...