Search found 53125 matches
- Sun Feb 22, 2015 10:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Performance issues - help with clean-up of files in /Scratch
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1523
- Sun Feb 22, 2015 9:32 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Partition method for creating key change column
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1443
Re: Partition method for creating key change column
Not quite true. DataStage will select a partitioning method that will always work. It may not be "best". It will be guaranteed to partition the data correctly for the stage in question.udayanguha wrote: Datastage will take care of the best partitioning method
- Sun Feb 22, 2015 9:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Partition method for creating key change column
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1443
Auto will give you Hash on the (entire) Sort key. It may be more efficient to specify explicitly under a couple of circumstances. If there is high cardinality on the first Sort key, you may prefer to partition on that key only. If the Sort key is an integer, then the Modulus algorithm will be more e...
- Fri Feb 20, 2015 2:49 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Unix file handles: multiple jobs reading one file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1981
- Fri Feb 20, 2015 3:22 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Multiple rows output required from lookup
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4041
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:04 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Import error for decimal field in csv file
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2248
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: XML Output stage repetitive data elements issue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3140
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:31 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: XML Output stage repetitive data elements issue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3140
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:29 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Drop when lookup key matches?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1446
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:27 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Improving Sequence Compilation times
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4949
Yes, but all of the objects to be compiled have to be transferred from the engine, and various resulting objects need to be transferred back to the engine. A slow network plays havoc with compilation time.chulett wrote:I thought practically all of a Sequence job's compilation 'effort' happened on the client.
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sort with remove Dups
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2430
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Getting started with the IIS Operations Console Database!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3672
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:29 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Improving Sequence Compilation times
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4949
- Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:51 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: problem with oracle db sequencer
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3288
- Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Column name as job parameter
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1779
It occurs to me that you're not using the right tool for the job. Have you investigated IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy?