Search found 53125 matches
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Reading the parameter
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1076
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: can we write routines in PX?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1354
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:13 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: From routine to db table
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1340
Let's begin with a question - how does the routine generate the data in the first place? There are a few ways to get data from a routine into a file, the most usual is to use OpenSeq, Seek, WriteSeq and CloseSeq statements. For a single line of data, though, it may be enough to assemble the line of ...
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:27 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: why is it necessary to recompile if a job aborts?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1741
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:25 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Retrieving log from RT_LOG directory
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8439
Do learn how to Search DSXchange.
The answer to your question is already there.
As each new job is created it is allocated a unique number in the project. The name of the table that holds the mapping from job name to job number, as well as the job type, etc., is DS_JOBS.
The answer to your question is already there.
As each new job is created it is allocated a unique number in the project. The name of the table that holds the mapping from job name to job number, as well as the job type, etc., is DS_JOBS.
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:22 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Diffrance between Datastage 7.5x and 8.0.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1252
Welcome aboard.
One answer is 0.5 (ignoring the x, but then there's no such version as 7.5x).
There is no single major difference.
You should Search DSXchange for the answer to your question - it has been answered, probably more than once, in the past.
One answer is 0.5 (ignoring the x, but then there's no such version as 7.5x).
There is no single major difference.
You should Search DSXchange for the answer to your question - it has been answered, probably more than once, in the past.
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Oracle table is not getting updated
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1446
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Usage of Shared Container
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1123
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Special characters in column name
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6076
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:30 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Partitioning in Lookup Stage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2313
You are 100% correct to use Hash partitioning algorithm on the same keys on both stream and reference inputs. It is totally risk free if done correctly. On a single machine, Entire on the reference input isn't much of an overhead because a single copy of the reference data set is put into shared mem...
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:25 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to track which ETL job is loading 1 particular DB table
- Replies: 24
- Views: 9426
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:23 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Datastage to UNIX
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1229
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:22 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Major differences between ETL tools Datastage and ODI
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3777
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:17 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Database implementation for an ETL project
- Replies: 2
- Views: 841
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:10 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Data set descriptor location
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5656