Search found 53125 matches
- Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Loss of Records and No Errors Generated
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6411
- Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:17 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Hash Partitioning behaving erratically
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4243
- Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: read hash files from unix
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1196
The stage that terminated was IDENT1, an invisible transformer stage inserted by the job compiler because you have a link joining two passive stages in your design. I suspect that the cause of your problem is not in the hashed file stage at all. Reset the job (not recompile, but reset) and tell us i...
- Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Unable to Insert decimal value to oracle DB
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3397
- Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: [DataStage][SQL Client]Invalid cursor state
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5142
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:50 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Data set descriptor location
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5656
My main reason for keeping them on separate file systems is that if you lose one you don't lose the other, and may therefore be able to reconstruct at least the structure (maybe even restore from backups). My reason for keeping the control files in a subdirectory in the project directory is mainly &...
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:47 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Hash Partitioning behaving erratically
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4243
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Java stage - Multiple records processing
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2021
Why do you think that? Pipeline parallelism is automatically implemented in parallel jobs through the mechanisms of virtual Data Sets (on each link) and transport buffers (used primarily for repartitioning). Of course, internally, every stage processes record by record, but they are consuming and pr...
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:42 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: abort a job
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1402
Re: abort a job
my requirement is to abort a job when data in a link has reached some threshold. thershold means the percentage of data which is dynamic. Why would you want to do this? Are these rejected records? Do you want to do this as the job is running, or is it OK to check in, say, an after-job subroutine on...
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:40 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: abort a job
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1402
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Hash Partitioning behaving erratically
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4243
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:36 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Partitioning in Lookup Stage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2313
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DSCONFIG file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1341
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:34 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Run UV SQL via DataStage
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5392
Is it being picked up in the SELECT clause? Then maybe you can use the column alias name in the WHERE clause. (I haven't tried this.) SELECT INSTANCE, DTM, MODIFIER, REASON,CAST(CAST(CURRENT_DATE -1 AS VARCHAR(10)) || ' ' || CAST(CURRENT_TIME AS VARCHAR(10)) AS VARCHAR(20)) AS DT FROM UNNEST DS_AUDI...
- Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: problem with DB2 installation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 907
Clearly the installer is not identifying SP2 as being later than SP1. You need to contact your support provider and they need to contact IBM on this one - it appears to be a bug in the installer. Maybe you could change Windows to English, do the installation, then change Windows back to Polish. But ...