Search found 53125 matches

by ray.wurlod
Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:10 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Reverse the aggregation Process
Replies: 5
Views: 1666

What is the largest number that will appear in column #3?
What should happen if column #2 is not precisely divisible by column #3?
by ray.wurlod
Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:06 am
Forum: General
Topic: Failed validation
Replies: 3
Views: 1058

Please post full detail of any exact error from the job log. "Validation failed" is a status that suggests you ran the job in validation mode. But this is only a guess, because I can not see the exact error.
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:47 pm
Forum: Enhancement Wish List
Topic: Parallel Aggregator Stage "Preserve Type"
Replies: 0
Views: 2165

Parallel Aggregator Stage "Preserve Type"

Introduced in version 8.1, Preserve Type property is mutually exclusive with Sum Output Column property at the field level. This should be picked up by the stage GUI or the precompiler. (This is my enhancement request.) It isn't picked up, and that that leads to a rapid job abort at run time with a ...
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:53 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: REMOVE DUPLICATE WORDS
Replies: 9
Views: 3497

:oops: I completely missed noticing the DBA !
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:32 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DataStage vs. Ab Initio
Replies: 22
Views: 23259

Care to include a price comparison?
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:30 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Removing . from decimal value.
Replies: 3
Views: 1498

As has been explained numerous times in the past (a Search would have found them), DataStage always adds leading and trailing nonsignificant zeroes and a decimal placeholder when the data type is Decimal, to prove that precision and scale are being handled properly. If you don't want them, convert t...
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:20 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Num of EE stages in a job
Replies: 1
Views: 853

"Am I right?" will almost always be answered with "maybe, maybe not".

The essence of your thought processes should revolve around the capacity of your database server to accept connections.

Of course the goal is not always to saturate it just because you can.
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:00 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: xmeta restore
Replies: 8
Views: 3768

Assuming that XMETA was backed up properly (with the database quiesced or shut down and using database utilities) then you can restore objects in the database as at the time the backup was taken. If there have been objects created or amended in the interim, their status may be undetermined. It depen...
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:57 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Delete multipel table definition categories
Replies: 5
Views: 1509

Multi-select is available in version 8 (it does a Quick Find under the covers) but not in version 7.
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:54 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Error: int 32 to decimal
Replies: 9
Views: 3072

0xFD is a "value mark" (@VM). But that's completely unrelated to the original question which is about data type conversion. Please start a new thread for 0xFD question.
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:50 pm
Forum: General
Topic: SCD
Replies: 3
Views: 1569

Might there be duplicates in the source data? In that case there's more to do. Are all columns Type 2 changes, or do you need to consider only some columns' changes? Map out the logic in a specification/flowchart and the rest will follow quite simply. For detecting changes where there may be duplica...
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Range Lookup Warning
Replies: 2
Views: 1195

Welcome aboard. You're going to have problems preventing this alert message, since it comes from a component you did not include in the design. Range lookups are compiled into transform operators, and it's from one of these that the alert is being generated. Your best approach is to demote this aler...
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:45 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: REMOVE DUPLICATE WORDS
Replies: 9
Views: 3497

You can use PAL but, as you note, it will be quite cumbersome. You'll need to have the first PrimaryName already copied, then do a condtional pattern to handle the second PrimaryName. The condition, of course, will be an equality test; if it is satisfied reclassify the second PrimaryName to the Null...
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:43 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Test Environement for Match Designer
Replies: 3
Views: 2936

Did you change anything between the two runs, or must we assume that you encountered a transient error?
by ray.wurlod
Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:04 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Where Clause of Filter stage
Replies: 4
Views: 12854

SQL functions are not permitted in the WHERE clause of a Filter stage. Refer to the Parallel Job Developer's Guide for full information about what is permitted.