Search found 53125 matches
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:38 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Job slow in reading sequential file
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2511
The first thing you need to do is to be sure you've named the correct culprit. Create a job that consists only of a Sequential File stage and a Copy stage, and measure your read speed with that. You could experiment with multiple readers per node in this job too. I strongly suspect that the problem ...
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:26 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Build new map error for NLS
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1565
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: handle different metadata using a single job?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2651
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Sequencing Job
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2199
There are no statements in a Nested Condition activity. All you need are the (Boolean) logical expressions. Use the expression editor to build your expressions, so that you get the syntax of the parameter reference correct. All you need in the expression is
Code: Select all
x = 'region1'- Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:16 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Repository database
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2346
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:15 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Difference between MACRO and @variable
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1953
All DataStage processes are background processes, so the question of response time is moot. Memory demanded is largely a function of design. Using less memory can in some cases cause slower execution time, rather than faster. Doing things on disk is substantially slower than doing the same things in...
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: shared metadata...
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1990
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Repository database
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2346
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Datastage evaluation edition
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1392
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Datastage Architecture
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1629
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Difference between MACRO and @variable
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1953
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:57 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Transaction Size
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1844
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:56 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Repository database
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2346
There exists a stage for connection to UniVerse databases. There is no connection between DataStage and UniVerse other than the historical one, that DataStage originally used UniVerse as its repository and engine. While the local repository database and server engine still look and behave quite simi...
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:34 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: shared metadata...
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1990
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DB2 Error occurred during link open processing
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2238