Search found 53125 matches
- Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:35 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: na
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2295
- Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:33 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Job names not appearing on repository
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4337
- Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Does DataStage support supplementary character set?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1838
- Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Invalid Format - Date
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5676
- Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: na
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2295
- Sun Feb 13, 2011 7:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: compare values in transformer stage
- Replies: 27
- Views: 10357
Is this an interview question?
WHY must you use a Transformer stage?
Have you performed a Search of DSXchange? Very similar questions have been asked and answered even quite recently, such as this one.
WHY must you use a Transformer stage?
Have you performed a Search of DSXchange? Very similar questions have been asked and answered even quite recently, such as this one.
- Sun Feb 13, 2011 7:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: compare a value from 2 records
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3529
- Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: parallel routine for reconciliation purpose
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7826
- Sat Feb 12, 2011 8:09 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: MS SQL SERVER Database IP address change
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1539
- Sat Feb 12, 2011 3:30 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Match specification
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4847
The match rate is primarily driven by your data. It may be impossible to "improve" it. If the match specifications are correct, the matches in the data (and only the matches in the data) will be detected.kennyapril wrote:Please suggest if any changes are required for improving the match rate or count ??
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:32 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: String extract
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5160
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:31 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Encrypted password is decrypted in the log
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2334
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:58 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: String extract
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5160
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:56 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Job giving correct output in development but not giving in p
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2128
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SQL 2008 geography data type
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2279