Increasing timeout consequences ? No one to answer ?

Post questions here relative to DataStage Server Edition for such areas as Server job design, DS Basic, Routines, Job Sequences, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
kaps
Participant
Posts: 452
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:36 pm

Increasing timeout consequences ? No one to answer ?

Post by kaps »

We ran into the following problem recently.

ds_ipcput() - timeout waiting for mutex

we had to increase the timeout parameter and the job ran fine.

Job design...Source and Targets are files. 5 transformers and each transformer has 4 hashed file lookups. Inter process is enabled.

I believe timeout happens because of resource contention. when we run more than one job at the sametime and the CPU is busy one job waits for the resources to be freed and for which we specify the wait time as timeout.

Questions:
1) If my understanding is correct, if we set some large value in timeout then the jobs would not fail. Am I correct ?
2) Seting the timeout to high number like 300 secs is going to cause any performance issues ?
ajrandrup
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:13 am

Post by ajrandrup »

This is an interesting question.
Would anyone have an idea?
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Which timeout are you setting, and how are you setting it?
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Post Reply