Parallel job reports failure (code 139)

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
nishantrk
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:43 am

Parallel job reports failure (code 139)

Post by nishantrk »

Hi,

I went through all the related posts , which give me a understanding that the Parallel job reports failure (code 139) is more sort of generic message and there could be many reason for the error . However in my case am not getting other message like core dump / Segementation fault etc.
There is absolutly no other information in the log ...

We have 3 seq jobs each having 5 extract jobs (in total 15 jobs) which reads from oracle table and writes to file . The abort happens randomly on any job and works fine on restart.
Is there any variable which can help me Debug and pin point this issue ...
Since this is production system , would like to have a concrete thing before making any change..
nishantrk
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:43 am

Re: Parallel job reports failure (code 139)

Post by nishantrk »

These are the two confifuration parameters , which has been recommneded by others to change..
APT_MONITOR_SIZE = 50000
APT_MONITOR_TIME = 10
priyadarshikunal
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 1735
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:44 am
Location: Troy, MI

Post by priyadarshikunal »

try this link.

Also, it may relate to segmentation faults or some other issue. Do you get anything when you reset the aborted job? something like "From previous run"
Priyadarshi Kunal

Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. :wink:
nishantrk
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:43 am

Post by nishantrk »

yes have gone through that link before posting..we are not getting this type of error in any other develpoment enviroment...
Unforutunatel no other message except for the 139 error
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

What does your official support provider advise?
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
PaulVL
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 1315
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:36 pm

Post by PaulVL »

Are these multi instance jobs? Are they running concurrently?
priyadarshikunal
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 1735
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:44 am
Location: Troy, MI

Post by priyadarshikunal »

Did you try resetting it to check if something like "from previous run" appears in reset logs.

also try setting APT_DISABLE_COMBINATION (or something like that) to true for that job.
Priyadarshi Kunal

Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. :wink:
Post Reply