| Author |
Message |
ray.wurlod
Participant
Group memberships: Premium Members, Inner Circle, Australia Usergroup, Server to Parallel Transition Group
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 49962
Location: Canberra, Australia
Points: 271527
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have imported a heap of Categories and Terms. The are visible under Drafts. I have taken 14 of these through request for approval and then approval. There are 14 items showing as Approved.
I click Publish. I get the following error:
Some revisions to glossary content have not been approved. Content currently in the draft or pending approval states in the development glossary must be approved before you can publish.
When all new and changed categories and terms are approved, click Publish to update the published glossary with the changes. Publishing changed categories and terms overwrites the existing versions of them in the published glossary.
This seems wrong to me. Publish should only pick up items whose state is Approved, surely?
Why would Business Glossary require that absolutely all new and changed items (drafts) be approved before permitting publication?
Aghast.
|
_________________ RXP Services Ltd
Melbourne | Canberra | Sydney | Hong Kong
Delivering Outcomes Together |
|
|
|
 |
qt_ky

Group memberships: Premium Members
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 1255
Location: USA Kentucky
Points: 8955
|
|
|
|
 |
ray.wurlod
Participant
Group memberships: Premium Members, Inner Circle, Australia Usergroup, Server to Parallel Transition Group
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 49962
Location: Canberra, Australia
Points: 271527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that's what I'm running into. Even though it's how the product works, it doesn't make sense to me. I basically have to delete all the draft items (436 of them) before I can publish the 14 I ne ...
|
_________________ RXP Services Ltd
Melbourne | Canberra | Sydney | Hong Kong
Delivering Outcomes Together |
|
|
|
 |
qt_ky

Group memberships: Premium Members
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 1255
Location: USA Kentucky
Points: 8955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's entirely possible. You're on the bleeding edge... We have BG 8.7 setup but not yet actively attempting to make it work. I guess this is somebody's idea of how publishing should work. I agree; it's not my idea of how it should work in the real world. I can't imagine any technical reason it was implemented that way.
|
_________________
Eric
_________________
I do want to express myself, okay. And I don't need 37 pieces of flair to do it.
|
|
|
|
 |
ray.wurlod
Participant
Group memberships: Premium Members, Inner Circle, Australia Usergroup, Server to Parallel Transition Group
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 49962
Location: Canberra, Australia
Points: 271527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm raising a PMR to find out whether there's any workaround.
|
_________________ RXP Services Ltd
Melbourne | Canberra | Sydney | Hong Kong
Delivering Outcomes Together |
|
|
|
 |
ray.wurlod
Participant
Group memberships: Premium Members, Inner Circle, Australia Usergroup, Server to Parallel Transition Group
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 49962
Location: Canberra, Australia
Points: 271527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It actually gets worse.
When I select all 436 draft items and click Discard Drafts, "an unknown error has occurred" pops up. So I can't even delete the ones that are still in draft.
Not hap ...
|
_________________ RXP Services Ltd
Melbourne | Canberra | Sydney | Hong Kong
Delivering Outcomes Together |
|
|
|
 |
eostic

Group memberships: Premium Members
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 2816
Points: 22056
|
|
|
|
 |
ray.wurlod
Participant
Group memberships: Premium Members, Inner Circle, Australia Usergroup, Server to Parallel Transition Group
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 49962
Location: Canberra, Australia
Points: 271527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patch JR41793 applies. It allows what IBM is choosing to call "fine grained workflow publishing", which is described in
this tech note.
It will be a little while (bureaucratic hurdles) before ...
|
_________________ RXP Services Ltd
Melbourne | Canberra | Sydney | Hong Kong
Delivering Outcomes Together |
|
|
|
 |
qt_ky

Group memberships: Premium Members
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 1255
Location: USA Kentucky
Points: 8955
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent. Thanks for sharing. I'm going to have to apply that also.
I found this related patch description where they've named it
Business Glossary 8.7 rollup patch 1
.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1JR41793
|
_________________
Eric
_________________
I do want to express myself, okay. And I don't need 37 pieces of flair to do it.
|
|
|
|
 |
vmcburney
Participant
Group memberships: Premium Members, Inner Circle, Australia Usergroup
Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 3431
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Points: 26448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I downloaded and installed Business Glossary Rollup Patch 1 from IBM Fix central - which is a rollup patch across all the products - and the fine grain publishing is now working. I can choose to publish just a selection of approved terms even if there are drafts. It is much better than the original version of workflow.
|
_________________ Certus Solutions
Blog:
Tooling Around in the InfoSphere
Twitter:
@vmcburney
LinkedIn:
Vincent McBurney LinkedIn
|
|
|
|
 |
ray.wurlod
Participant
Group memberships: Premium Members, Inner Circle, Australia Usergroup, Server to Parallel Transition Group
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 49962
Location: Canberra, Australia
Points: 271527
|
|
|
|
|
|
The readme for the rollup patch indicates that patch JR41793 is included.
The joys of being on the bleeding edge!
|
_________________ RXP Services Ltd
Melbourne | Canberra | Sydney | Hong Kong
Delivering Outcomes Together |
|
|
|
 |
|
|