I'm getting this error AT RUN-TIME. I've searched here and on Google and the search results are only about compilation errors.
The job is pretty basic: Oracle source goes to a Data Rule stage where I check for duplicates on a combination of 3 fields and output to a sequential file.
Here is the full log text:
Job_name: Error when checking composite operator: Composite operator output was not redirected.
Thanks in advance.
Error when checking composite operator at run-time
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
Error when checking composite operator at run-time
Todd Ramirez
Sr Consultant, Data Quality
San Antonio TX
Sr Consultant, Data Quality
San Antonio TX
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:48 am
- Location: Bangalore
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
They are not.
A composite operator occurs when one stage generates two (or, theoretically, more) operators, such as the Data Set stage generating one operator to delete the Data Set and another to populate it, when write mode is Overwrite.
A combined operator (APT_CombinedOperatorController) occurs when the job optimizer groups two or more operators into a single process if they are (a) executing in the same set of nodes, (b) using the same partitioning, and (c) executing in parallel mode.
Therefore disabling combination will not affect composite operators.
A composite operator occurs when one stage generates two (or, theoretically, more) operators, such as the Data Set stage generating one operator to delete the Data Set and another to populate it, when write mode is Overwrite.
A combined operator (APT_CombinedOperatorController) occurs when the job optimizer groups two or more operators into a single process if they are (a) executing in the same set of nodes, (b) using the same partitioning, and (c) executing in parallel mode.
Therefore disabling combination will not affect composite operators.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Sorry, I cannot dump the job score of the particular run. It seems our job logs are purged constantly.
However, I did two things:
- put a Transformer between the Data Rule stage and the sequential file
- removed length/precision of 38/10 for an integer column
I don't know which one fixed the problem, but the job ran successfully after the changes.
Will close with a work-around for now.
However, I did two things:
- put a Transformer between the Data Rule stage and the sequential file
- removed length/precision of 38/10 for an integer column
I don't know which one fixed the problem, but the job ran successfully after the changes.
Will close with a work-around for now.
Todd Ramirez
Sr Consultant, Data Quality
San Antonio TX
Sr Consultant, Data Quality
San Antonio TX