DSXchange

Hi all,

I have a sequence job that contains say 5 parallel jobs. In the fourth parallel job trigger, I have to output links. One link is for a "successful" run, and the other link is for a "failed" run.

For the successful trigger, I have this conditional statement: "DSJS.RUNWARN or DSJS.RUNOK".

However, it happened that when this fourth job ran and failed, the fifth job actually started. This is not something I want. When the fourth job fails, I do not want the fifth job to start.

Now in the Director log, I do see that this fourth job threw warnings. Now my question is: Even if the job fails and has warnings in the job log, does the 'DSJS.RUNWARN' make the sequence job move on to the next job?

Thanks in advance.

RUNWARN means "finished with warnings" so it would have to "succeed" but have warnings rather than actually ABORT for the trigger to pass control thru.

One suggestion - if you have two triggers and one should go forward and everything else should stop, I always used "Otherwise" on the latter so I didn't have to list out all of the things not covered by the former.

Thanks for the quick reply chulett.

I am not a premium member, so I cannot see your entire answer. However, I am thinking you are confirming my beliefs that DSJS.RUNWARN can allow the sequence to continue even if the job is aborted when the job has warnings.

I would think the safest route with have the custom trigger read something like:

I opened it up, hopefully it helps.

hi jweir,
I think Craig meant that the DSJS.RUNWARN definitely needs the job to succeed and have warnings to pass through.

If the job had aborted with warnings, there is no way for the trigger to get activated.

Can you please re-validate your trigger conditions ?

Thanks.

If you are saying the RUNWARN has to succeed in order for it to move forward, then something else must be at play. My current trigger for the 'success' link was:
And for my 'failed' link was just the Expression Type 'Failed' option.

So then my question still remains then. How can this setup produce the results I was seeing?

I made a test and put the 'success' link with this code:
and that code worked as expected. After the job failed, the next job did not start.

Any more thoughts?

Thanks in advance.

Ack... forgot to point out the fly in the ointment!

Those values are just the "1" and the "2" you used explicitly in your second example, they do not stand on their own. So your first attempt equates to saying "1 or 2" which is always true.

Combine the two to get everything all proper like:

Ah ok. So you are saying by putting the below just in the trigger, no matter what, it is always true?
I will test out your suggestion.

Thanks.

Yup! It needs to know what ran ok or with warnings.

Thanks chulett. Your suggestion worked.