Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:53 pm
Detailed responses depend on the question, time available to the premium poster, and the general interest in responding. Why should we repeat what we've often answered so many times? Why should we waste time on what someone could answer for themselves by reading the manual or searching this forum? We're not a quick answer guide for lazy persons either. We are not here as a substitute for training. If we can point out a page in the manual that covers things in detail with pretty pictures, why can't we point that out?
I think you can see from this forum that we do give detailed answers, and we do invest a lot of personal time in answering questions. We have high expectations that folks out there are also willing to ponder, research on their own, and share in a discussion. If someone asks "how do I use hash files best", we're going to not spend a lot of time going over things available in newletters, posts, and whitepapers. If someone says "what's the advantage to a type 19 over a type 30 hash file", than we we probably cover that in a little more detail.
I think you can see from this forum that we do give detailed answers, and we do invest a lot of personal time in answering questions. We have high expectations that folks out there are also willing to ponder, research on their own, and share in a discussion. If someone asks "how do I use hash files best", we're going to not spend a lot of time going over things available in newletters, posts, and whitepapers. If someone says "what's the advantage to a type 19 over a type 30 hash file", than we we probably cover that in a little more detail.