DSXchange

Hi Ray, thanks for the reply. This is just in column analysis. I have the DataClass defined and enabled in IGC, and it's listed in the IA analysis settings and selected. It's also a regex-based DataClass. I have a few thousand records in the table, and about 500 are identified as my DataClass, along...

Hi all, Hopefully this is just me missing a step in the process somewhere, but here goes... I have created a custom DataClass in IGC. It's a regex and has been tested externally to work just fine. It has been enabled. It appears and is enabled in IA under the analysis settings I run CA over a column...

Ok, it's been a little while, but I'll have a crack: 1 - param1 is a parameter for the type of comparison you are using, and different comparisons obviously require different parameters (either 0, 1 or 2). In the case of the 850 and 800, they would be for one of the uncert functions, and tells the f...

WoW?
Isn't that taken already?

How did you set it up?

Like this?

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.w ... wg21617260
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.w ... wg21614129

You might be able to create a tool that generates OSH based on your information and then run that through the command line, but how to do that is way beyond my level of knowledge in that area.

The thing about the ISAuditLog..N.log files is that they don't get down to project level, only the client app.

If you have your I and O records split into 2 streams as you suggested earlier, the STAN stage the I records are sent to should probably be set to Default to Individual and the STAN for the O stream should be set to Default to Organisation. Then I records with + + would be handled by default as Firs...

You're currently getting the Reference Duplicates.
Did you select the option to output Data Duplicates?

Thanks, OP. I needed a chuckle this morning.

Hi, not sure if there's a Brazillian set of rulesets. You may be able to create your own. I know they're not the same but the ES rulesets might be close enough to help somewhet. You can split the names by Individual and Organisation if you already have them categorised. It would tend to be as reliab...

If it were me, I would take the 2 seconds and pick Same.
I should be telling DS what to do. That's what people pay me for.

I would think it makes you think about what you're doing. If you just take the easy way out and Auto everything, you stop taking note of what you're doing and soon you find your job is repartitioning the data numerous times (and sometimes needlessly), and performance will suffer. If you make yoursel...

Define "performance". Number of matches, "quality" of matches (lower false positives / negatives), execution time? As Ray said, the quality of score may improve a little by using accurate frequency data. As for execution time, the number of records and number of match passes woul...

+1 for Ray and Robert's approaches. - Token analysis to understand the + and whether they would add value to classify. This can often direct a lot of records to existing patterns for very little effort. - Further character analysis to see what's up with the @ tokens. You might need to split some or ...