There's more on upserts in thisthreadpravin1581 wrote: Can you please elaborate your answer , sorry I didn't get you.
Search found 251 matches
- Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:51 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Upsert Vs Insert/Update
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5324
- Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Commas in data value...How to fix the existing file ?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1841
- Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Upsert Vs Insert/Update
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5324
Even if you don't want to use the bulk loading capabilities of an Enterprise stage, there are still advantages to be had from separating your inserts and updates. If you use an UPSERT with an array size of (say) 500 with Insert set to try first, then DS will attempt to insert all 500 rows in one sta...
- Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:15 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Log warnings
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2167
Sounds like you are reading a Packed Decimal, which - from memory - uses the first nybble to designate the sign. What datatype have you specified in the DataStage source stage? Have you retained that datatype all the way through the other stages? Have you used the correct conversion function to conv...
- Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:11 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: group in the password file
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3191
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Problem returning @TRUE, @FALSE from Routine to Transformer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7643
Also worth noting: A routine call entails a small performance overhead - possibly a context-switch - but I'm no expert. My bechmarking reveals that native BASIC functions can be executed orders of magnitude faster than routines that encapsulate the very same functions. With relatively simple logic l...
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: dynamic sql in oci stage.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1548
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:13 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Inserting Parameter Value into Oracle Stage forHeaderTrailer
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2869
- Thu Nov 15, 2007 1:18 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How I can get a Report which lists the status of all Jobruns
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5165
There are probably a couple of ways, but all of them are a bit tricky. From DataStage shell ($DSHOME/bin/dssh) you could write a SQL that joins the appropriate tables. That would require a detailed knowlege of the unpublished UniVerse table structure and an even more detailed knowlege of UniVerse. I...
- Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:15 pm
- Forum: Information Analyzer (formerly ProfileStage)
- Topic: DS Hawk installation hung up at end (no error message)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3038
- Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:08 pm
- Forum: Information Analyzer (formerly ProfileStage)
- Topic: DS Hawk installation hung up at end (no error message)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3038
- Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:47 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: I receive fatal errors from Parallel job in DS v8
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4673
I don't know about the DB2 stage, but the Dynamic RDBMS stage works fine with Environment Variables in Server but fails in Parallel. It seems likely to me that DB2 is the same. We raised the Dynamic RDBMS problem with IBM - demonstrating how it worked with the VIEW DATA button but not at runtime - a...
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:42 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: I receive fatal errors from Parallel job in DS v8
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4673
Looks like the same problem as this thread - ie. its not translating your environment variable. As I said to other poster (who hasn't replied yet): Instead of running the job, try View Data from the DB2 stage in the designer window. There is a bug in the Dynamic RDBMS stage (at least in v whereby it...
- Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:20 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: NextSurrogateKey()
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14645
- Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:15 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Environment Variables
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7834