Search found 296 matches

by throbinson
Fri May 22, 2009 6:28 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XMLInput stage and RCP
Replies: 3
Views: 2396

I could not get this to work because I could not squish the xpath into the description of any column within a schema file. I believe that IF THAT could be done then you might be able to fix up some kind of RCP. Big if. I believed at the time and still believe your best bet would be some kind of cust...
by throbinson
Fri May 15, 2009 9:27 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Job failed
Replies: 3
Views: 3822

Probably this; Occurred: 8:39:56 AM On date: 5/15/2009 Type: Fatal Event: SEQ_SRC_FILE_E1,0: Filter status 512; (...) But so what? Whenever I get a gazillion warnings, I start at the first one and fix as many as I can before re-running. Some of the more obvious ones might be cascading into others wh...
by throbinson
Fri May 15, 2009 9:08 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Job failed
Replies: 3
Views: 3822

I believe that is enough detail. As a general comment, You've got tons of Metadata problems. You've got to match your Oracle Stage with the actual DDL in Oracle, including Nullability. One gotcha is function calls; They are reported to DataStage as DECIMAL(38,10). Another is an Oracle NUMBER no prec...
by throbinson
Tue May 12, 2009 7:43 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: concatenating the target file with the system date
Replies: 4
Views: 2836

Try using a DS Macro. If the format is acceptable it would be somewhat simpler then the other suggestions.
sample#DSJobStartDate#.txt
by throbinson
Thu May 07, 2009 1:49 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Preserve Partitioning option when using multiple stages
Replies: 6
Views: 3937

This implies you are using a partitioning scheme other than Entire in the Look-up stage. Is this really required?
by throbinson
Fri May 01, 2009 9:55 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Merge Technique
Replies: 2
Views: 2054

The SERVER Merge stage takes no input links and outputs a single link. The input to this stage is two flat files that are sourced from within the stage itself.
by throbinson
Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:46 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: lookup warning
Replies: 7
Views: 4501

It seems to me you need to take a step back and think about doing a little research/learning on the tool. This specific problem has been answered in this forum, if not a bazillion then certainly a gazillion times. Do a search man! It is your friend. In the time it takes to ask, you'd have been answe...
by throbinson
Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:51 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: if i have more than 10 keys columns to vertical pivot logic
Replies: 7
Views: 2211

Yeah, what he said.
Now, you know you'll have to handle the outliers as special cases.
For example;
1. The very first row in won't match prev but may not have to be written out immediately.
2. The very last row in needs to be triggered to write it out, even if curr matches prev.
by throbinson
Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:01 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Oracle table creation by DS: column order?
Replies: 15
Views: 5426

This is the last high-jacking of this post, I promise. That is exactly what I am saying. When creating a teradata table in EE, if a PI is not specified, the first column becomes the PI. Primary Index Property Help; Comma-separated list of field names that will become the primary index for tables, if...
by throbinson
Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:50 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Oracle table creation by DS: column order?
Replies: 15
Views: 5426

With Seinfeld and the swirl as with Teradata Enterprise Stage and the PI; the order can make a significant difference.
by throbinson
Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:05 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Oracle table creation by DS: column order?
Replies: 15
Views: 5426

I eye-balled the same when DDL-ing a Teradata table in EE. I had the newbie hope my first column would be the P.I. if none was explicit-ized. By bad as the stage Hal2000'd a column of it's own choosing causing major skew and hot ampin' like a Moe foe. I'll circle the wagons to see if the derivations...
by throbinson
Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:10 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: if i have more than 10 keys columns to vertical pivot logic
Replies: 7
Views: 2211

The order of the Stage variables is of paramount importance. The number of keys is not. If the order is as you've listed them above then the "IF" stage variable will never detect a key change. The "current" comes first followed by the stage variable that detects the key change an...
by throbinson
Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:56 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: First parallel job
Replies: 13
Views: 5939

I believe so. DSCAPIOP is not your problem.
by throbinson
Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:53 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: How to differentiate between changes to a datastage job
Replies: 2
Views: 1486

You'd need an exported copy of the job before and after the change was made. You could diff the two and get close. I don't know the best way to do this in Windows although I have done it with some XML "diff" utilities in the past. This obviously means exporting the job before/after as xml....
by throbinson
Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:31 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: First parallel job
Replies: 13
Views: 5939

The DSCAPIOP problem manifests itself at the stage level. Meaning the job itself and most stages will substitute correctly. I think it would be worth checking to make sure the ODBC stage is correctly substituting as well. To do this I think you need to set the Project Reporting variable OSH_DUMP to ...