Search found 5168 matches
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:43 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: regarding usage of a field that is not part of Aggregator.
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9541
As mentioned earlier, Billing Date should be part of your Aggregation Key group. But technically, if you want to leave out one filed on the aggregation and want to join it later, you ll have to do it literally the same. You ll have to use the Join (or other Stages to join) the filed from the source ...
- Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:07 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Hash partitioning and sorting
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6971
- Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:21 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: view .o file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2109
- Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Strange Input buffer overrun problem
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4889
- Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Convert function ??
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4835
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:57 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Datastage jobs Using Oracle Table
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4009
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Lookup stage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6252
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:29 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Is this possible with Runtime column propagation?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13574
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:26 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Problem with logging into Director - Project locked
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9818
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:54 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Dataset
- Replies: 13
- Views: 6723
You would need to try to ensure that the locations of your dataset descriptor does not match to the data file you are removing. You wouldn't want to delete data that someone is dependent upon. Most environments will have a handful of environmental vairables used to direct the location of the descri...
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: offset warning in the sequential stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4101
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Maltiple instances of jobs
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2214
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Cannot view data for sequential file
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14168
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Implementing OR condition
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4973
Try adding a dummy column in the references. And you can use the dummy column to check the lookup condition. If you cant add the dummy column... Then, you may need three lookup stages. On failure of the first lookup, reject the recorcs to second. On failure of second lookup, reject the records to th...
- Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:35 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Cannot view data for sequential file
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14168