Search found 15603 matches
- Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Time conversion using StringToTime
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1118
Time conversion using StringToTime
This function works as I expect StringToTime("05-08-04","%hh-%nn-%ss") but the data that I am seeing sometimes has only one digit for the hours, minutes or seconds, in which case the same function doesn't work. I wonder if I am missing something in the format string that ...
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:36 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: TOTAL
- Replies: 3
- Views: 862
I've worked with Progress before - shouldn't be too difficult to extract the data into flat files and FTP the data over. I am very surprised that there is a mainframe implementation of Progress; and probably 90% of the denizens here have never even heard of Perkin-Elmer. That name belongs in the ann...
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: make changes to a shared container
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2963
I agree that engineering (as well as the rest of the company) has treated shared containers badly for years. At least now they work are no longer black holes for coding work - it used to be that once stages passed the 'event horizon' of a shared container they were lost forever and could no longer b...
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Attempted READ of record ID larger than file/table maximum
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4083
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 2:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: make changes to a shared container
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2963
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 2:13 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Attempted READ of record ID larger than file/table maximum
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4083
Just to add to what Ken Bland already implied - don't raise this value unless you understand what it might entail. I think it far better to look at your key string and decide how you can compress it - most commonly by taking fields out of the key and moving them to the data portion. 768 is an awfull...
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:15 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Having problems proving latest claims in "Tips: Hash fi
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1197
ggarze, there is no difference between the methodologies used in hashed files on Windows and UNIX. The minimum modulus is used only in type 30 hashed files and starts the file off with that modulus as opposed to the default value of 1. If your file contains enough records so that at the minimum modu...
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Routine to validate US State Codes
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1829
In this case all the States are 2 digits and don't contain substrings of each other so the quick INDEX() will work well. If you were looking up a country list which might have ...USA,UK,UKMENISTAN... {doesn't exist, but I couldn't think of a better example} then it would make sense to change the com...
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Conversion of date from (Mon dd yyyy hh:mmAM) to (dd-mon-yyy
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5773
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:59 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Conversion of date from (Mon dd yyyy hh:mmAM) to (dd-mon-yyy
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5773
You need to do this in 2 steps, first convert the date portion into internal format telling it what the formatting is, then convert it to an output format in the new format. OCONV(ICONV(In.DateColumn[1,11],'D4MDY'),'D4DMY'[2,3,4]):In.DateColumn[12,99] This takes your text date and tells Datastage th...
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 5:31 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Link Partitioner/Collector Performance issue
- Replies: 3
- Views: 782
The interprocess memory is set to 1024Kb (so 1Gb), you have 4 of them so the system will allocate 4Gb of virtual memory to "speed things up". Instead of being a good thing, this allocated memory needs to be swapped out to make room for user processes and associated memory. So it seems that by making...
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 5:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: procedure stage
- Replies: 1
- Views: 457
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 5:22 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel Extender Memory issue.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 6917
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 5:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Reusable Job to be used Concurrently
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1602
- Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:22 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: upgradation from 6 to 7.5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 855