DSXchange

Yes, indeed, it is.

pandeesh wrote:if transforms are exist only in server jobs, then the server routine is basically written in BASIC.

Basically written in BASIC, indeed.

In the immortal words of Blue Oyster Cult: Don't Fear the Server.

ray.wurlod wrote:However, Information Server does have a scheduling service in version 8.

Since the original release, or was it added along the way?

It's all detailed in the linked post and the issue was the hard 4GB limit of 32bit addressing so it can't be the same problem you are having.

Off the top of my head, a Server job (or Server Shared Container) writing to the Folder stage or using the UNIX csplit function after the file has been written could do this.

Start by telling us exactly which compiler you installed.

zulfi123786 wrote:would be gratefull if you would elicit how 32 and 64 bit differ with respect to look up

This is my run-in with that particular difference. Not your issue here but specific to your question.

There is no 'native' DataStage scheduler. What is has is an interlude / interface to the standard scheduling utilities of the underlying O/S. So, for a UNIX server, when you are looking at or manipulating the schedule in Director, you are seeing the cron entries it has automagically created for you....

zulfi123786 wrote:its a 64 bit operating system.

What about DataStage? Is it 64bit as well?

Matter of fact, what O/S are we talking about here?

Unfortunately, the exact message can be critical to the resolution as 'space' can mean several things. I'm curious, what is the 'bit-ness' of both your O/S and DataStage version - 32bit or 64 bit? That plays a role here as well.

Aborted how would be my first question.

Assuming they have a decent Enterprise scheduler, that is. We have to assume, unless specifically noted otherwise, that the 'scheduler' in question here is DataStage itself and for a repeating schedule on a UNIX system that means via cron.

Don't you mean pswimming?

Sorry. Me, I have no idea what either letter stands for... waiting to be educated.

Short answer: the versions must match.

The long answer is in another recent thread... which Eric was kind enough to link to.