Search found 42189 matches
- Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:37 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Teradata Connector Stage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1679
- Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:35 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Update is not working correctly in Oracle stage
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3353
- Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Update is not working correctly in Oracle stage
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3353
- Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:08 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Send mail with notification stage error
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11248
I'll say it again - if your error is coming from the stage rather than the command line, leave the mail server property there empty if you aren't doing that already. See if that fixes things. If you can't get it to work from the command line then you've got bigger problems and need to involve your S...
- Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:03 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Update is not working correctly in Oracle stage
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3353
Realize that for these combo actions to work, the first action must fail for the second to be triggered. An update fails if it doesn't find a row to update. An insert fails when it already exists and it is covered by a unique constraint of some kind so it physically cannot be inserted into the datab...
- Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:24 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Send mail with notification stage error
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11248
- Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 Non-recoverable Bulk Load (Table in check pending state)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4768
Nope but I'd wager others with DB2 and DataStage experience do. What about whatever passes for a 'stored procedure' in DB2? A typical workaround would be to craft a procedure is owned by the table owner that performs the function in question and then your ETL functional user would be granted the abi...
- Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:18 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Strange termination of Sequence job
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3785
Can't answer that question. Did you perhaps change the logging from one location to the other and what you are seeing are pre- or post-change? Or is it set differently per project? Perhaps it is specific to your version, something you haven't mentioned yet. You'd really need to put that in front of ...
- Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Handling Null values for Date, Timestamp in Schema file only
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3878
Why post this again? You already have a perfectly lovely version of your question here and that is where you should back to if you have additional questions. This one is done.
<click>
- Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:09 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error with bulk load
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2617
- Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:11 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 Non-recoverable Bulk Load (Table in check pending state)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4768
The same way you would outside of DataStage. I would provide specifics if I could but I've never touched DB2 in my life. However, from hanging out here and reading the documentation (are you using the DB2 Connector?) it seems like DB2 always leaves a bulk loaded table with check constraints or refer...
- Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DB2 Non-recoverable Bulk Load (Table in check pending state)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4768
- Sun Aug 26, 2012 6:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: look up failure
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1640
- Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:10 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: look up failure
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1640
Re: look up failure
By ensuring that your value being looked up is in the lookup set and that your values are identical... including things like leading zeroes if you are dealing with a string.hargun wrote:how can i resolve this one.
- Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: look up failure
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1640