Search found 42189 matches
- Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: hours to time
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5771
Hmm... where is the corresponding change in the conversion? It looks like OConv is still delivering the time in AM/PM format and it needs it to be in Military / 24 Hour format, hence the HH24 in the picture. So rather than the end result being '2006-08-29 05:00:00pm' it should be '2006-08-29 17:00:0...
- Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:20 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: hours to time
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5771
Re: Date and time concatenate
Result is 2006-08-29 05:00:00pm But the issue is ,Orcale is not accepting this and throws an error as ORA-01830: date format picture ends before converting entire input string Because, by default, Oracle is not expecting a Timestamp in that format. It wants what you had before you converted the tim...
- Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:10 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Abort the Sequence as soon as job logs 1 warning
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4753
- Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:59 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Abort the Sequence as soon as job logs 1 warning
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4753
A script or 'wrapper' process that uses dsjob to run the job rather than using the Director to run it. That script can have the "-warn 1" in its command line to enforce that rule. The only other way would be to change the default in the Director so that it defaults to aborting after 1 warning, but t...
- Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:41 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: RTI service Stops all of a Sudden
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3456
- Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Abort the Sequence as soon as job logs 1 warning
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4753
Now since i am running the job through Sequence, i don't have control to set the job limit. Sure you do... or at least you should. If you run the Sequence job itself with a Warning Limit of 1 it should pass that limit to all child jobs it runs automatically. As noted, it's supposed to be as easy as...
- Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:46 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: RTI service Stops all of a Sudden
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3456
- Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:10 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Warning message during installation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2029
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:55 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Compare ETL
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1814
I'll have to check that out as it's been a long time since I've done much of anything with the RA. Unless you've migrated the repository to something else, that would require some knowledge of Access... not all my peoples do. And I don't believe the Reporting Assistant supports Sequence jobs, do it?
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:44 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Header & Trailer Record Warning
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4343
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:40 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Aggregator problem!!
- Replies: 26
- Views: 5937
It does work and is actually a pretty standard technique for handling static values across a job's run. Custom routines can be leveraged in the Initial Value derivation of a stage variable for consistancy across jobs. And then, as noted, leave the derivation empty in the job so it retains its initia...
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:28 pm
- Forum: Site/Forum
- Topic: Congrats Craig on your 7000th accomplishment
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5536
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:58 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Replacing multiple strings with others
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1386
is this correct? That looks just fine. Of course, you could inline the functions like Narasimha has noted if you were doing it in a derivation. For a custom routine I'd probably do them all separately as you've done. Easier to read and easier to maintain. One of the Grognards would have to comment ...
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Compare ETL
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1814
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:15 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Multi Instance job
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1138