Search found 42189 matches
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:46 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DataStage jobs not able to access the oracle table.
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2204
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Reading Encrypted Data
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2705
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Reading Encrypted Data
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2705
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DataStage jobs are not visible in the Designer
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3800
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: User Status
- Replies: 19
- Views: 6948
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:14 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: difference between oracle oci 8i and 9i
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2165
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: FTP
- Replies: 4
- Views: 874
As noted, the suffix of the file being sent makes no difference. A 'put' or 'mput' will gladly move them along just like any other file. Find someone at your site more familiar with shell scripting and ask them for help... best to have eyes right there with you. Either that or explain what 'not goin...
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:09 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DataStage jobs not able to access the oracle table.
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2204
Welcome aboard! :D That's not very much information to go on. There shouldn't be any issues connecting to an Oracle instance on another server, that's normal stuff. All we can tell from the error is the connection was broken - could be network issues, an idle timeout, any number of things that are n...
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:04 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Cannot find record JOBPARAMINSTS in executable job
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4497
- Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DataStage jobs are not visible in the Designer
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3800
sumesh.abraham wrote:DS.REINDEX ALL command can be executed now as per the procedure stated by you.
You seem to have skipped all the other parts of what little of a 'procedure as stated by me' exists in this thread. Where did I tell you to query anything?
Oh well, at least you can't make your problem any worse.
- Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:14 pm
- Forum: Site/Forum
- Topic: Someplace to upload files...
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1963
Someplace to upload files...
Is there any such beast around here? Other than asking Kim to host something for me again, that is.
- Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:11 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DataStage jobs are not visible in the Designer
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3800
It shows "SQL+" because it is asking for the rest of your statement... you need a semi-colon at the end of the statement to get it to actually run. You need to ensure ALL connections are closed before running the reindex command or you are wasting your time. Best to do this by shutting the DataStage...
- Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Stored Procedure
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3636
Create a new job with a Stored Procedure stage linked to a Transformer and then a Sequential file stage. Set the Procedure type to 'Source' on the Syntax tab. Run it after the other job finishes, a Sequence job can do that easily for you unless you've got another form of job control in place. And fi...
- Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DataStage jobs are not visible in the Designer
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3800
- Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Stored Procedure
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3636