Search found 42189 matches

by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:12 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Load Vs Upsert in Oracle Enterprise Stage
Replies: 6
Views: 2836

Re: Load Vs Upsert in Oracle Enterprise Stage

Suman wrote:Is there any reason for failure.

Of course there is, but *you* would need to tell *us* the reason. Post the actual errors that you get when the 'Load' option is used.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:09 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: JOBCONTROLLER
Replies: 6
Views: 1520

Indeed.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:07 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: XML Question
Replies: 13
Views: 3970

'non-printable' characters, eh? So they're not actually spaces, it would seem. What does a quick peek with a hex editor at the XML reveal is really there?
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:03 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: DRS, Oracle OCI and Oracle Enterprsie
Replies: 13
Views: 2518

I guess that's one way to get your post count up quickly. :wink:

The Oracle Enterprise stage is the only one native to the Parallel engine.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:59 pm
Forum: Site/Forum
Topic: When will the Site be back to normal?
Replies: 6
Views: 4596

Walter, you *do* know I posted that well before we had any idea what was going on, yes? :(

Give'em hell, Harry.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:34 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: XML Question
Replies: 13
Views: 3970

An 'alphanumeric' field means what in your job - exactly what datatype are these fields?
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:56 am
Forum: Site/Forum
Topic: Top Posters
Replies: 7
Views: 4436

Wow... so that was why it was taking so long to bring up the Home page. :shock:

Much more snappier now. Setting up a separate page for information of that information sounds like a good idea to me.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:29 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Job Category
Replies: 12
Views: 2540

Just add it at the end of the query.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:46 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: XML Question
Replies: 13
Views: 3970

Post your syntax.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:45 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Job Category
Replies: 12
Views: 2540

That would be the COUNT.SUP that Ray mentioned.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:59 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: XML Question
Replies: 13
Views: 3970

'Trim, convert and other functions' should work just fine. Have you followed Arnd's advice?
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:56 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Row with Max Date
Replies: 5
Views: 1651

Will you get the following output? No. Argh! It always helps to give as complete a description of what you need to do as possible from the beginning. It will cut down on the amount of thrashing people trying to help you will go through. Your examples show that neither of the two techniques I listed...
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:31 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Job Category
Replies: 12
Views: 2540

Cool, thanks. I thought it might be one of those 'one word' style dealios ala 'DET.SUP'. :?
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:17 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Unique Sequence Number
Replies: 7
Views: 1356

Double-click on the routine to examine the source code. You'll need to use the 'Concurrent' version instead if others will be needing sequences for the same table at the same time.
by chulett
Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:13 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Capture Bad records
Replies: 2
Views: 994

Which will allow you to read them and thus they will no longer be 'bad'. You can still check the field for terminators after the fact and logically reject them if you like.