Search found 42189 matches

by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 10:24 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: TNS:Could not resolve service name
Replies: 10
Views: 4874

Re: TNS:Could not resolve service name

If I enter the actual values for the parameters here in the parameter window it works fine. What exact 7.x version are you running? I'm wondering if it is an older version since you're still using the OCI8 stage. And I seem to recall that older versions may not fully support the $PROJDEF (etc) conc...
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 10:20 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: TNS:Could not resolve service name
Replies: 10
Views: 4874

Re: TNS:Could not resolve service name

Also, when I was looking for solution on this problem there was many suggestions to use tnsping from datastage admin to check for connectivity. When I tried from DataStage admin -> command and executed tnsping <servername> it did not work. I have received message "TNSPING not in VOB". (si...
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 10:12 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: TNS:Could not resolve service name
Replies: 10
Views: 4874

You guys need to read the thread and not just jump onto the end, trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. :?
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 3:30 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Import routine from dsx file
Replies: 16
Views: 8734

Guess again.
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 2:51 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Near Future Roadmap for Server Jobs
Replies: 5
Views: 1475

Especially considering the fact that the "server engine" is what enables Sequence jobs to exist.
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 2:45 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Near Future Roadmap for Server Jobs
Replies: 5
Views: 1475

Not going to happen.
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 1:09 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: MQ configuration issue
Replies: 6
Views: 2506

Hmmm... don't know anything specifically about MQ but the 8.0.1 release was notoriously buggy. Do you have the "fix pack" of patches installed? Have you checked with your official support provider to see if there is a patch available for this issue? You may be doing everything right but ne...
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 10:29 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Error While saving a Job in V8.1
Replies: 6
Views: 2366

Search. An exact match on "Unable to save EditServ" returned 10 matches, so there's 9 other people who have had the same problem.
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 7:29 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Problem with Pivot and bulk load stage
Replies: 3
Views: 1348

Is this something that used to work and has stopped working, or have these stages never worked for you? :?
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 7:28 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Regarding LOG file
Replies: 6
Views: 2108

In other words, there's no need to know "where" they are stored, there is a perfectly good API - BASIC or command line accessable - to fetch log information.
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 7:20 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Import routine from dsx file
Replies: 16
Views: 8734

You can try that, but I think I had to actually import everything, job and all, to get the routines to come along for the ride. It's been awhile, so who knows. Let us know, if anything, works for you.
by chulett
Fri May 08, 2009 7:18 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: How to ignore warning......in sequencer
Replies: 4
Views: 1954

I thought "message handlers" could only be used in Parallel jobs. :?
by chulett
Thu May 07, 2009 10:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: warning while running a job
Replies: 10
Views: 4140

First step actually is posting the question in the proper forum.
by chulett
Thu May 07, 2009 8:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Client licensing clarification
Replies: 5
Views: 1487

Even more obtuse than that. Let's say five people are connected. A ten-user license connects, there are now six people connected and the limit is ten. A five-user license then attempts to connect... That user gets successfully connected, and there are seven people connected. BUT the limit is now re...
by chulett
Thu May 07, 2009 5:49 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Client licensing clarification
Replies: 5
Views: 1487

Hmmm... let me see if I follow. :? Let's say five people are connected. A ten-user license connects, there are now six people connected and the limit is ten. A five-user license then attempts to connect... do they get in because the limit was ten even thought the total number (seven) is technically ...