Search found 42189 matches

by chulett
Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:33 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: job finishes with status =99
Replies: 3
Views: 1362

It could also mean it was "not runnable" because that invocation was already (aka still) running from a previous invocation of the job.
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:29 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Dataload into Multi Table
Replies: 3
Views: 1820

Unfortunately, this forum is not moderated.
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: logic on group number
Replies: 6
Views: 1685

That sounds like one solution, a Mod() would have worked as well, I would think. Or a simple counter checking against the parameter value. As usual, more than one way to skin the cat. :wink:
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:22 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: logic on group number
Replies: 6
Views: 1685

It's not all *that* different, you simply reset on a count rather than a key change.
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:22 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: XML Parser Problem
Replies: 5
Views: 4145

Because technically an XML file isn't a flat file with rows and columns, it's a stream of data that could very well just be one long "record". Sometimes it can be read like one with success but more often reading it in that fashion just plain ol' horks it up. Best Practice is to avoid the ...
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:16 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: logic on group number
Replies: 6
Views: 1685

Yet another chance to use stage variables to control that, something very similar to what was just posted here I would wager:

viewtopic.php?t=135971
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Sending Multiple Attachment from Notification Activity
Replies: 9
Views: 11407

They noted that they've already tried that and had issues. From what I recall, it can depend on your platform and mail server, they don't all work the same way. Some want a comma between the files names, some want a "comma space" and I believe I had one where it took a semi-colon. Still, z...
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:33 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Oracle error 01841
Replies: 7
Views: 3304

Hence the problem. If you really want to build 'environment neutral' solutions for date/time handling, you'll bring them in as strings from your source, ensure that string source is in a valid format for the target and then use TO_DATE() or TO_TIMESTAMP() in your target sql with a matching format ma...
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:00 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Partitioning streams and references
Replies: 7
Views: 2257

And just to further discuss this, one of the last clients I worked with had a 64bit development and test environment but a 32bit production environment for some silly reason. Entire partitioning on their loads, which involved a significant amount of lookup activity, worked fine small or large volume...
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:48 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Partitioning streams and references
Replies: 7
Views: 2257

But definitely keep it in mind for when you are doing 'huge' lookup volumes, I've seen people run into issues in a 32bit environment when they did not follow that advice.
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:45 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Oracle error 01841
Replies: 7
Views: 3304

Tell us exactly how you are handling that value: data type in source and target, transformations, IConv/OConv, source and target sql, etc etc. We would need an appropriate level of details from you in order to be able to help in anything more than a very generic manner.
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:41 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: performance problem in 8.1 server job
Replies: 3
Views: 1915

More about your job design and what is going on in your target than your source query, I would wager. As noted, details would be appreciated.
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:39 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
Topic: Unable to pass same column value to two params in STP stage
Replies: 4
Views: 1562

Specifically wondering about the syntax in the SP stage, the anonymous block it generates and what parameter markers are being used. Don't recall, but if that stage uses the Oracle numbered parameter markers, you should be able to use the same column more than once easily. If it uses the '?' positio...
by chulett
Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:34 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Date type conversion
Replies: 3
Views: 1595

StringToDate() followed by DateToString() using an appropriate format mask in both cases. Don't have access to my reference materials but off the top of my pointy little head, %yyyy-%mmm-%dd and %yy-%mm-%dd respectively?
by chulett
Tue Sep 14, 2010 9:04 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: How to read chineese characters through seq file in ds
Replies: 5
Views: 1595

Is this a PX job as per the forum you posted in, or is this a Server job as you marked the post?