Search found 42189 matches
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: job finishes with status =99
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1362
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:29 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Dataload into Multi Table
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1820
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: logic on group number
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1685
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: logic on group number
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1685
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: XML Parser Problem
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4145
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:16 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: logic on group number
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1685
Yet another chance to use stage variables to control that, something very similar to what was just posted here I would wager:
viewtopic.php?t=135971
viewtopic.php?t=135971
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:05 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Sending Multiple Attachment from Notification Activity
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11407
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Oracle error 01841
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3304
Hence the problem. If you really want to build 'environment neutral' solutions for date/time handling, you'll bring them in as strings from your source, ensure that string source is in a valid format for the target and then use TO_DATE() or TO_TIMESTAMP() in your target sql with a matching format ma...
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:00 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Partitioning streams and references
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2257
And just to further discuss this, one of the last clients I worked with had a 64bit development and test environment but a 32bit production environment for some silly reason. Entire partitioning on their loads, which involved a significant amount of lookup activity, worked fine small or large volume...
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Partitioning streams and references
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2257
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:45 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Oracle error 01841
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3304
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:41 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: performance problem in 8.1 server job
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1915
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Unable to pass same column value to two params in STP stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1562
Specifically wondering about the syntax in the SP stage, the anonymous block it generates and what parameter markers are being used. Don't recall, but if that stage uses the Oracle numbered parameter markers, you should be able to use the same column more than once easily. If it uses the '?' positio...
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Date type conversion
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1595
- Tue Sep 14, 2010 9:04 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to read chineese characters through seq file in ds
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1595