This conclusion seems highly suspect to me as well.anandapani wrote:Then design team concluded that, this is because of server routines called from the BT of the parallel job, which are running in parallel when job run in muliple instances.
Search found 42189 matches
- Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Server routine to parallel routine
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9170
- Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:59 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: job status
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1864
- Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Link Collector stage -sort operation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1700
- Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:07 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: job status
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1864
- Sat Oct 16, 2010 7:02 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Server routine to parallel routine
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9170
Re: Elaborating the requirement
I completely and whole-heartedly agree with Mike. Just because you have the Enterprise Edition does not mean that everything must be a PX job. Both weapons in your arsenal have strengths and weaknesses, use the appropriate one for the appropriate task. And for goodness sake, don't think your first o...
- Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:53 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: job status
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1864
- Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: coding
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1584
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:05 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: How to list jobs modification dates?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 7110
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:00 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: How to list jobs modification dates?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 7110
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:49 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Datastage 8.1.1 Bug
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3548
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Performance Statistics
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1550
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Stored Proc Stage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4646
Hmmm... what database? I honestly don't recall having to do anything special for Oracle but perhaps things change in other databases. Or I'm wrong. :? Also realizing that I've been thinking of the SP stage in a Server job, perhaps it being in a PX job also changes the rules. Hopefully someone can sh...
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:03 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: ODBC taking longtime to unload the data
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7688
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:51 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Server routine to parallel routine
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9170
1. Not really a DataStage question 2. Documented in the Parallel guides, from what I recall From the questions, it sounds like these 'Server' routines may not need to be converted at all. Typically routines that call out to the O/S or leverage the API for job/log information are used before/after jo...
- Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:33 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Declare/Use of Variables from SQL Oracle Table data?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 11515