Search found 53125 matches
- Sun Oct 02, 2005 4:49 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: about usage of Link partitioners
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1817
I'll always keep an open mind (which is different from a hole in the head). Sure there will be exceptions to every "rule", and Arnd has highlighted a good one. I probably would have gone the same way there, or I may have split the task to load into a single local source (text file would do, and fixe...
- Sun Oct 02, 2005 4:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Dynamic SQL
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2513
- Sun Oct 02, 2005 4:43 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: how to clear up job instances' log more quickly
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3572
- Sun Oct 02, 2005 1:37 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Data warehouse failures
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4950
The worst site I've ever worked was succinctly described by the account manager who contracted me. "You don't have to worry about the goal posts shifting - they haven't even figured out what game they're playing." Prophetic words, alas. Phase 1 delivered six months late, with some parts of it shifte...
- Sun Oct 02, 2005 1:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Works with job name change!!!!!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5389
Data are sent to the job monitor (JobAppMon) through named pipes. If something goes wrong with that mechanism, then job monitoring is disabled, but does not prevent the job from continuing to execute. This is the first warning you posted. This may or may not be related to the waitForWriteSignal() fa...
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:31 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem in Implementing the logic using buildop
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4010
Without having given it a lot of (unpaid) thought, I would tend to plan along the following lines. There is a small number of different input file layouts. I would design a separate job for each of these then, in a job sequence, make the decision about which of these ought to be used based upon the ...
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Data warehouse failures
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4950
One particular case. 8 because of 10 but, really, the cause of failure was the ill-advised decision to try to deliver everything (including loading of archival/historical data) in phase 1. It couldn't be delivered on time, and what was delivered had not been properly tested because of time pressures...
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Problem with Multi Instance Job
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2935
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:20 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Dynamic SQL
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2513
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:14 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Teradata multiload and parallel processing question
- Replies: 4
- Views: 956
About a month ago an Ascential pre-sales support person ran a demo from DataStage EE (parallel job) that fired off a Multiload script from each node in the job - that is, multiple instances of Multiload into the same table. There were no issues with locks, as the partitions contained independent set...
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Works with job name change!!!!!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5389
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: fileset Stage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1506
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:10 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: User-Defined SQL behaves differently in 7.5.1A
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3702
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem in Implementing the logic using buildop
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4010
is there any way to parameterise the "Interface> Input" in buildop stage,so that we can give different retailers schema file at runtime) Alas, no, which is going to make your task rather difficult. You will need to design an approach the uses a standard schema, but which allows for columns to be mi...
- Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:02 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: about usage of Link partitioners
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1817
I do not like to use Link Partitioners to achieve partition parallelism (see Chapter 2 of Parallel Job Developer's Guide ) in server jobs. A job that uses a link partitioner presumably splits one stream of data for multiple processing. And a link collector has to gather them all back together into a...