Search found 53125 matches
- Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Specifying column information at runtime.
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1545
The "trick" - which will work in server or in parallel jobs - is to create "generic" column definitions then to use user-defined SQL the whole of which is supplied through a job parameter (such as #SQLStatement#). This may, for example, need to select constants to fill the unneeded columns or column...
- Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:00 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: APT_String and other PX types
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2222
- Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:57 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Datastage job return code(Real urgent friends)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3705
- Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Does DS ODBC use usual Database ODBC???
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1443
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:20 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: List of environment variables
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4402
One of the pieces of advice I always give when running the DataStage Essentials class is "right click everywhere!". There just isn't enough screen real estate to make the whole of the functionality visible. For example who knew that every Director view has a filter? Or that you can view data in Desi...
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:11 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Hub and Spoke - Performance issue
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2722
UniVerse tables ARE hashed files. Ah, ignorance is bliss! Hashed files are quite able to handle millions of rows, particularly if the rows are small (key and one or two columns). If you need to go over 2GB in any one hashed file, enable 64-bit addressing for that hashed file. And the hashed file rea...
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Windows 2003 64 bit
- Replies: 4
- Views: 891
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:04 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Reading xml file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1247
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Specifying column information at runtime.
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1545
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:00 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Lookup on Binary Data
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1312
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:56 pm
- Forum: Site/Forum
- Topic: Write a Book!
- Replies: 40
- Views: 20405
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:39 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Hub and Spoke - Performance issue
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2722
You're doing all the lookups in one Transformer stage? One thing you can do is to separate it out into two or three Transformer stages (or more) and use explicit IPC stages to force them to execute in separate processes. Your current design is trying to do all six lookup from one process. Three Tran...
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Datastage Version
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1203
Stage type versioning is separate from versioning of the base product. This is one of the great advantages of the "plug-in" architecture - a new version of a stage type can be introduced without needing to create a new version of DataStage. And then, since Oracle preserves a certain level of backwar...
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:29 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: List of environment variables
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4402
- Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Jobs invisible in Job Activity for Sequence
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2347
Try dragging jobs from the Jobs branch of the repository directly into the job sequence. These seem to be OK. There also seems to be a problem where the job's category is more than one level deep. I don't know if this is related. And, as noted above, I did not fix this systematically, so I can't gue...